SkyBluePower
Well-Known Member
He may get away with this- depends on Norwich who A: didnt have an injury to the player and B; won the game
He may get away with this- depends on Norwich who A: didnt have an injury to the player and B; won the game
Why does it depend on Norwich?
I think someone has to report/complain about it.
Remember when we played Forest and won 2-1 with a last min winner. O' Hare received a elbow to the face by one of their players. Officials didn't see the Forest player received a 3 game banIt says the FA can become aware of an incident in a variety of ways, one via the Refs report as an incident not seen (so Norwich would have made the ref aware of it). Or Norwich include it in their match report and the Ref is asked did you see?
Possibly other ways the FA can become aware like high profile media attention. But Norwich complaining either to them or the Ref would be the most likely source.
Remember when we played Forest and won 2-1 with a last min winner. O' Hare received a elbow to the face by one of their players. Officials didn't see the Forest player received a 3 game ban
It says the FA can become aware of an incident in a variety of ways, one via the Refs report as an incident not seen (so Norwich would have made the ref aware of it). Or Norwich include it in their match report and the Ref is asked did you see?
Possibly other ways the FA can become aware like high profile media attention. But Norwich complaining either to them or the Ref would be the most likely source.
It looked like a fair challenge to me too.
None of that means Norwich have to report it though. Which is what you said.
Why wouldn't they report it? If they thought their player was fouled aggressively off the ball and the ref didn't see it, I'm pretty certain they'd want it reporting so that it doesn't happen again.
A 3 match ban would rule him out of games including vs Oxford and WBA - two of Norwichs relegation candidates. They'd defo want him banned.
If it happened against us and we still won, we'd all be wanting the club to report it.
They may well want to report it but they don’t *need* to for the FA to investigate.
Didn’t kin elbow him anyway. The guy was grabbing Asante’s arm. He pulled it free and then swung his arm out and caught him with his forearm. Ferkin idiot deserved a smack.
If the Norwich shits are going to condemn him,we shouldn’t join them.
From my vast experience of Sunday League football, absolutely, yes!Just to be clear, are you saying what Sakamoto did, seemed fair?!
Again, if they want a key opposition player ruled out for games against survival candidates, they would likely *want* the FA to investigate, especially as there's sufficient evidence of wrongdoing.
From my vast experience of Sunday League football, absolutely, yes!
Just to be clear, are you saying what Sakamoto did, seemed fair?!
None of that means Norwich have to report it though. Which is what you said.
During the iFollow broadcast the angle they showed it looked really bad. The closer up angle replay from pitch level it looks a lot more like a tussle to break free from the defender rather than a deliberate arm in the face.
Now perhaps I am biased because I believe Asante just isn't that sort of player - a deliberate elbow like that just isn't his game at all.
Fair point well made. Let's try not to let the relevant authorities see this. Delete your post immediately.You could say the same about Dasilva but he got a tackle wrong and deservingly got a red card. The problem for Asante is his arm is very high so more likely to hit the players face than his chest. So it’s an unnecessary challenge off the ball that puts the other player in danger of injury.
Fair point well made. Let's try not to let the relevant authorities see this. Delete your post immediately.
West Brom will be without Brandon Thomas-Asante for the next three games after he was hit with a retrospective ban by the FA following an incident in the 3-3 draw at Chesterfield.During the iFollow broadcast the angle they showed it looked really bad. The closer up angle replay from pitch level it looks a lot more like a tussle to break free from the defender rather than a deliberate arm in the face.
Now perhaps I am biased because I believe Asante just isn't that sort of player - a deliberate elbow like that just isn't his game at all.
Don’t think saka was a red and if he reacted to a kick from the Norwich player maybe Norwich need to stay quiet about that oneReading this makes me think that Norwich will have reported it:
‘For me they are clear red cards’ – Clement on Mattsson and Fisher blows
Philippe Clement felt Coventry deserved two red cards for incidents involving Brandon Thomas-Asante and Tatsuhiro Sakamato in the Canaries 2-1…www.pinkun.com
Philippe Clement, in talking about both the Asante and Sakamoto incidents, said ". . . it's not my job to talk about those things".
Charged at the player and knocked him to the groundwhat did Saka do as didn't see it .. also was he provoked?
They cant do anything about the Sakamoto incident as the ref booked him for it.Don’t think saka was a red and if he reacted to a kick from the Norwich player maybe Norwich need to stay quiet about that one
They cant do anything about the Sakamoto incident as the ref booked him for it.
I’m sure he did book him?No he didn’t. We only had 1 yellow card in the game and that was for Esse.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thought he booked clementThey cant do anything about the Sakamoto incident as the ref booked him for it.
He's being constantly fouled every game.. he get's no protection until he's been fouled 2 or 3 times.Charged at the player and knocked him to the ground
Think he was kicked off the ball
During the iFollow broadcast the angle they showed it looked really bad. The closer up angle replay from pitch level it looks a lot more like a tussle to break free from the defender rather than a deliberate arm in the face.
Now perhaps I am biased because I believe Asante just isn't that sort of player - a deliberate elbow like that just isn't his game at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?