Nick Administrator Oct 25, 2020 #1 Another weird decision. Goal disallowed because they thought it had touched a player it didn't. Then they thought Schmeical was impeded and there was nobody near him. VAR strikes again.
Another weird decision. Goal disallowed because they thought it had touched a player it didn't. Then they thought Schmeical was impeded and there was nobody near him. VAR strikes again.
Frostie Well-Known Member Oct 25, 2020 #3 Nick said: Another weird decision. Goal disallowed because they thought it had touched a player it didn't. Then they thought Schmeical was impeded and there was nobody near him. VAR strikes again. Click to expand... Inexplicable
Nick said: Another weird decision. Goal disallowed because they thought it had touched a player it didn't. Then they thought Schmeical was impeded and there was nobody near him. VAR strikes again. Click to expand... Inexplicable