fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
It was much lower than you'd think 0.08 somehow
It was much lower than you'd think 0.08 somehowAnyone find Tatsus post shot xG? @skybluecam I know you’ve found this before
Don't think we go up this season personally, I thought we would go on a decent run at some point, but even if we make the play offs which we are well placed to do now, I think we lose over 2 legs to whichever teams end up finishing 3/4th.
Next year is our year I feel, but will gladly be wrong.
As do we???Luton failed because they needed the promotion cash to build a stadium instead do investing in players
As do we???
Mines been slow for weeks now, thought it was my phone. I have to keep closing the tab and reopening it. Not just me then!Seems to have been down a few times recently. Truck load of pop ups as well
It isn't, not sure where that table was from but it's wrong. GA 41, xGA ~35It's surprising to me that, after all of the bad goals we gave up earlier with Collins, our xGA is higher than our actual GA.
Could it be that our xG is reduced because we've been ahead in games, as a result we have generally sat back more?You’ve got to admit it’s weird we’re doing better while our xG has gone backwards though.
Absolutely obsessed. I guess I should take it as a compliment. I don’t remember any of your posts.
No but you have to have a decent core; It is high risk to try to buy the bulk of a new team over a summer break. Notts Forest very much the exception. Burnley seem to have the right approach.I wouldn’t worry about the team not being prem quality - until we get there!
No team promoted to the premier league is prem ready. We would have to recruit well in the summer to give ourselves the best shot. Either way though I’d take a pummelling every week in the prem then never go up. We have to aspire to being in the top division and by going up, we get parachute payments.
Isn't there a table or graph that show how many goals we've scored or let in and how many games we've played and points we've scored??? I can't seem to find one that matters !!Isn't there a table that shows that as well?
How many fans would we lose though is my concern after we've built them up unless we managed to get promoted and yo yo for a few yearsIt would be a hard watch, but the parachute payments should put us into the same brackets as the Leeds, Southamptons and Burnleys of this world so I'd take it.
How many fans would we lose though is my concern after we've built them up unless we managed to get promoted and yo yo for a few years
We haven’t seen our true potential yet. Things could fall into place playing a back 4 with sheaf and grimes in front and haji/emc on the wing
My issue is, and I know a lot of people disagree with me, but is now the time to try and find out?
6 league wins in 7 playing a back 5, brave man to change it.
I could see us using both depending on the game, and we’ve already seen us switch formation mid game. I think having sheaf back will give the defence the extra cover it needs as a 4, and with wright we’ll have more going forward too.My issue is, and I know a lot of people disagree with me, but is now the time to try and find out?
6 league wins in 7 playing a back 5, brave man to change it.
I could see us using both depending on the game, and we’ve already seen us switch formation mid game. I think having sheaf back will give the defence the extra cover it needs as a 4, and with wright we’ll have more going forward too.
Oliver DovinWe did. But we’re conceding more chances. Like I say Lampard putting some real holes in xG with this run.
No but you have to have a decent core; It is high risk to try to buy the bulk of a new team over a summer break. Notts Forest very much the exception. Burnley seem to have the right approach.
I see no point in being pummeled every week or even being Crystal Palace, where success is 16th and failure is 17th. Boring. I'd rather be chasing the Play offs each season. It's great fun, you win most weeks and the football is a high enough quality
Could it be that our xG is reduced because we've been ahead in games, as a result we have generally sat back more?
I haven't seen the stats, how much has our xG regressed?
I agree, I think the opposite is true if I'm honest.Hard to find without a load of work I can’t be arsed with (yet) but we’ve dropped from second in the xG league to I think 4th.
Someone said this theory before but I don’t buy it TBH. Teams at the top tend to be teams that win more than they lose. Leeds are consistently top for example. Would be interesting to see a correlation between time behind and xG but generally I just don’t buy that teams that go behind create more chances and concede fewer rather than just carrying on being behind.
My issue is, and I know a lot of people disagree with me, but is now the time to try and find out?
6 league wins in 7 playing a back 5, brave man to change it.
Yeah quite likely he will sell and Lampard will probably bail too because of possible inevitable offers for himYou'd like to think we could yo yo.
Of course receiving parachute payments is one thing, using the money wisely is another.
That's something I think King could be trusted to do though I think theres a strong possibility he'd punt us if we got promoted.
Rather see Rudoni central than play Eccles again to be honestWhen EMC came on yesterday we basically went 343, I wonder if that’s the compromise, but it does make it hard to fit Rudoni in. Something like:
Dovin
Lats Thomas Kitching
MvE Grimes Sheaf Bidwell
Saka Simms EMC/Wright/whatever you’re doing with the front three.
Yeah quite likely he will sell and Lampard will probably bail too because of possible inevitable offers for him
No but you have to have a decent core; It is high risk to try to buy the bulk of a new team over a summer break. Notts Forest very much the exception. Burnley seem to have the right approach.
I see no point in being pummeled every week or even being Crystal Palace, where success is 16th and failure is 17th. Boring. I'd rather be chasing the Play offs each season. It's great fun, you win most weeks and the football is a high enough quality
Nah it's all the pictures your old man photoshopped of people onto dogs bodies.
800gb? It's 2025.
What was the name of that lunatic who was obsessed with her? Sure he used to work for the council or something
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?