Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Are SISU really under pressure? (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter HuckerbyDublinWhelan
  • Start date Dec 19, 2016
Forums New posts
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #1
Haven't posted for a while, but thought I'd weigh in with my 2 cents.

had a discussion this morning with a friend, we were discussing how much we enjoyed the protest and whether SISU were aware of it. We then discussed whether it was better than NOPM (as you know I'm against it, my friend is for it)

We moved on to what Fisher said, he stated that the business was breaking even and even making profit. If we look purely at whether SISUs business is affected, are we asking the wrong questions?

No investor is going to look at CCFC and say "you're destroying a community football club" wouldn't SISU use CCFC and say we've turned this business around? And therefore actually look good in the eyes of the investors?

They're shoddy football club owners, but as a business they've turned us around.

All in all I've lost a bit of heart after this, I mean, sounding defeated - are we just doomed as a football club whatever we do?
 

Voice_of_Reason

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #2
I don't feel SISU are rattled yet, but believe TF might be. SISU lack emotion and purely look at the accounts. They don't care if we are in the Conference or not providing they are not losing money
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #3
Fisher is a hatchet man, I'm starting to feel that there is nothing we as fans can do.

If NOPM,the playing squad gets cut to an extent we just can't compete.

Whilst I believe that we're running ourselves, there isn't no conclusive proof bigger crowds = bigger budget. It'll be interesting as to what happens to the 1 million profit we're making goes but I assume we have to wait until Feb 18 for that info.
 

christonabike

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #4
Fishface said Sisu arent interested in CCFC. Ok lets make them interested by keep protesting and having SISU on all the banners etc. They will soon get wind of whats happening.
 
Reactions: no_loyalty and Brylowes
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #5
Fisher has actively made it clear that they or him couldn't give a shit what we say or do.

He's not even playing the PR game anymore it's clear he has animosity towards us, and SISU are happy to go along with it. I'm sure they're aware but as a business all they have to say is "Otium entertainment were losing 15 million before us, now we're making money"

SISU couldn't care less about the protests or banners.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #6
Let's wait and see. £1m profit? Is it operating or net? Two very different situations. Operating profit can easily mean a loss at net level.
 
Reactions: Voice_of_Reason
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #7
Valid point but that's only going to come to light in the Feb 18 accounts.

Feb 17 are going to show upto May 16, I'm under the impression that it's this season we're "making money"
 

westofrayne

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #8
Are they under pressure? No, in purely financial terms the club have been turned round from looking money to "breakeven"


So in SISU's eyes that's a success, hai this has been managed is not so important
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #9
Does anyone know the breakdown of what guaranteed income they have other than ticket sales (i.e tv money, football league money) and what their obligated running costs are other than player budget (i.e rent, general running costs).

In other words... if the attendance all season was 0 and they paid players £0 - would they make or lose money?
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #10
Are sisu under pressure, I would say so, name banded around in bad lights all over the Internet and now sky and such alike.

They also don't care as now we are breaking even and that's a success in their eyes. They literally don't have to put any money in and stick a fool in charge and it seems to run itself.

If we could rid these owners and get people in who care and can use ccfc to everyone's gain then we can start to climb again.

Unfortunately it's been said many times we are in a death spiral which currently leads us to league 2 and beyond perhaps. Until sisu go this is where we are going so I wouldn't be pissed off when we get relegated. It's where the business model is taking us.
 
Reactions: cloughie and Astute
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #11
I've read into their history, hasn't Sepalla been called a liar in court? Surely that's more damaging then comments on their ability to run a football club?

Stopping short of being involved in a scandal I don't think SISUs reputation could be tarnished in the way we need it.

I think I'll buy a season ticket next season in League 2 with more hope than anything.. but after that, if Is lower end league 2 I don't think I can justify the expenditure and just pick and choose games. This isn't because they're slipping, its because normally I start a season with hope that we'll finally achieve something. Once that goes, what's the point?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #12
Sbarcher said:
Let's wait and see. £1m profit? Is it operating or net? Two very different situations. Operating profit can easily mean a loss at net level.
Click to expand...
It will, there are some unaudited figures in an SCG minutes a few months ago.
Fisher revealed them, there is no way he would have done that unless he was fairly confident they were accurate.
I should think the accounts are all but signed off by now.
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #13
Voice_of_Reason said:
I don't feel SISU are rattled yet, but believe TF might be. SISU lack emotion and purely look at the accounts. They don't care if we are in the Conference or not providing they are not losing money
Click to expand...

I disagree, I believe JS is under pressure. She has to answer to Investors who will be starting to question where there money has gone, surly she can only fob them off for so long.
Am sure these people will want at least the money invested back, maybe she will have to sell her big house in Holland Park?
.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #14
Steve.B50 said:
I disagree, I believe JS is under pressure. She has to answer to Investors who will be starting to question where there money has gone, surly she can only fob them off for so long.
Am sure these people will want at least the money invested back, maybe she will have to sell her big house in Holland Park?
.
Click to expand...

I doubt the investors in the main know where the money is invested.

As for seppella and the court comments - that will be seen as a strength in the world sisu operate.
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #15
The way I see it, we're part of an investment portfolio. We have no way of seeing how that portfolio is doing.

If that portfolio is making money, then their business is doing well and can point to that to future investors in their business.

Like I said, I think we've got to a stage where we as fans think we're winning, bit Actually we're even further away from ridding ourselves of SISU
 
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #16
So, being part of an investment portfolio, is it possible to find out who the investors are in that scheme ?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #17
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
The way I see it, we're part of an investment portfolio. We have no way of seeing how that portfolio is doing.

If that portfolio is making money, then their business is doing well and can point to that to future investors in their business.

Like I said, I think we've got to a stage where we as fans think we're winning, bit Actually we're even further away from ridding ourselves of SISU
Click to expand...
Looking at their turnover, staff numbers and relocation they look like a body retreating into rationalisation.
 
Reactions: skybluetony176, cloughie, Astute and 1 other person
C

covman

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #18
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Haven't posted for a while, but thought I'd weigh in with my 2 cents.

had a discussion this morning with a friend, we were discussing how much we enjoyed the protest and whether SISU were aware of it. We then discussed whether it was better than NOPM (as you know I'm against it, my friend is for it)

We moved on to what Fisher said, he stated that the business was breaking even and even making profit. If we look purely at whether SISUs business is affected, are we asking the wrong questions?

No investor is going to look at CCFC and say "you're destroying a community football club" wouldn't SISU use CCFC and say we've turned this business around? And therefore actually look good in the eyes of the investors?

They're shoddy football club owners, but as a business they've turned us around.

All in all I've lost a bit of heart after this, I mean, sounding defeated - are we just doomed as a football club whatever we do?
Click to expand...
SISU may have cut the wages but they have also dramatically devalued their asset in doing so. As the main reason for buying was to sell on at a profit, I think you will find they have failed miserably!
 
Reactions: skybluetony176 and Kingokings204
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #19
harvey098 said:
Does anyone know the breakdown of what guaranteed income they have other than ticket sales (i.e tv money, football league money) and what their obligated running costs are other than player budget (i.e rent, general running costs).

In other words... if the attendance all season was 0 and they paid players £0 - would they make or lose money?
Click to expand...
Well revenue was a total of £3.8M @Sixfields. So somewhere about £3M IMO.
 

the rumpo kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #20
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Haven't posted for a while, but thought I'd weigh in with my 2 cents.

had a discussion this morning with a friend, we were discussing how much we enjoyed the protest and whether SISU were aware of it. We then discussed whether it was better than NOPM (as you know I'm against it, my friend is for it)

We moved on to what Fisher said, he stated that the business was breaking even and even making profit. If we look purely at whether SISUs business is affected, are we asking the wrong questions?

No investor is going to look at CCFC and say "you're destroying a community football club" wouldn't SISU use CCFC and say we've turned this business around? And therefore actually look good in the eyes of the investors?

They're shoddy football club owners, but as a business they've turned us around.

All in all I've lost a bit of heart after this, I mean, sounding defeated - are we just doomed as a football club whatever we do?
Click to expand...
I think the trick of turning the club around, is to make it break even without losing any ground or status. anyone can do things cheaply to save money.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #21
If only we found it as easy getting rid of SISU, as SISU seem too find it getting rid of us.
 
Reactions: griff123, Captain Dart, cloughie and 3 others
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #22
The strange thing is we are told wage inflation was a cause of struggling to recruit through summer On what Appears to be an increasing turnover but a reducing player budget
It would be handy to know if Mowbray spent to target of £2.3M or exceeded to £2.9M.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #23
georgehudson said:
So, being part of an investment portfolio, is it possible to find out who the investors are in that scheme ?
Click to expand...

Joy said to the Guardian a few years ago that they were American Universities endowment funds, European and Asian pension funds. Don't have the link but it's easy to find on the Web.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #24
Grendel said:
I doubt the investors in the main know where the money is invested.

As for seppella and the court comments - that will be seen as a strength in the world sisu operate.
Click to expand...
Losing court cases is seen as strength?
 
Reactions: skybluetony176, sjlccfc and cloughie

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • #25
James Smith said:
Joy said to the Guardian a few years ago that they were American Universities endowment funds, European and Asian pension funds. Don't have the link but it's easy to find on the Web.
Click to expand...
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-fc-owner-joy-6096912
Mrs Seppala said she anticipated the stadium would require 40pc equity (cash) with the rest borrowed, and added: “I have got people who are more than happy to fund that. I’m having discussions all the time with investors.” She said investors included wealthy families and financial institutions, including pension funds.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: Astute
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?