Grendel
Well-Known Member
As I say most on here agree it’s you whose biased and support my view
We're not talking about every time he plays, though. Might be showing your bias here. In the 45 mins he had, he showed more guts than most.
We're not talking about every time he plays, though. Might be showing your bias here. In the 45 mins he had, he showed more guts than most.
I would rate Sheaf a bit higher but the first half was just so uniformly terrible I think it caps anyone who started at 5/10. Most concerning is that McF has been hauled off at half time twice since he came back from injury.
I would rate Sheaf a bit higher but the first half was just so uniformly terrible I think it caps anyone who started at 5/10. Most concerning is that McF has been hauled off at half time twice since he came back from injury.
tbf to him it's more he's not our's, isn't it? He shows good attacking intent, has some pace and good technical ability. When McCallum first came in he was pretty diabolical defensively, and at a lower level than us now. Difference was we got the benefit the following season.Every time he plays he has a first 15 when he has some positive movement. He’s then easily snuffed out. Off the ball he’s utterly clueless - there’s zero attention or discipline. It’s like he just goes asleep
Captain Allen missing, just sayingYeah i think the first time was down to a change in shape (think we moved to a back 4 where i presume he's considered too slow) but this seemed more about his performance than anything else which is a worry. There was alpt of frustration on show from the players but nobody seemd to be pulling players up for screwing up and i felt we lacked leadership. Maybe everyone being so shit meant they felt they couldn't be critical
If you can explain how offering an opinion on a player's performance across 45 mins constitutes "bias", cool. Otherwise, will not read.As I say most on here agree it’s you whose biased and support my view
If you can explain how offering an opinion on a player's performance across 45 mins constitutes "bias", cool. Otherwise, will not read.
You supporting your opinion by saying "Look, people agree with me!" when you go to great lengths to be a contrarian is a solid LOL.
How have you given Dabo 2x McNallys score he was absolute garbage both in defence and going forward. Not saying McNally was good, his worst game for us without doubt but a one off. Dabo’s good games are a one offWilson 5
McNally 2
Fadz 4
Doyle 4
Dabo 4
Bidwell 4
Hamer 3
Sheaf 6
Eccles 4
Gyokeres 4
Godden 3
Subs
Wilson-Esbrand 4
Rose 4
Howley 4
Cuffy 3
Walker 5
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I'm basing on today's game only. McNallys was one of the worst individual performances I've seen in sky blue. Dabo was poor, but had the occasional good moment.How have you given Dabo 2x McNallys score he was absolute garbage both in defence and going forward. Not saying McNally was good, his worst game for us without doubt but a one off. Dabo’s good games are a one off
Agree apart from the Stoke bit thought they were bang average we made them look goodSheaf a 6. The rest all 3. Terrible, gutless performance. Stoke were very good.
He was sent on to try and get forward and get us back in the game, he was better doing that than Bidwell who probably had his worst game for us today.I assume you left before goal number 4
Agree apart from the Stoke bit thought they were bang average we made them look good
Favouritism.I still can’t understand how after 45 mins the 2 weakest player Dabo and Godden stayed on
You have to question the 2 'wing backs' for a team supposedly chasing promotion who were brought in on loan and also the inclusion of Godden who looks to be finished in this league, Walker had a good game last time out so out he goes once again for a player who is struggling to make any impression on any game!! fucking garbage springs to mind. Eccles was utter rubbish as was Howley who replaced him, Hamer got a booking for bringing one of their players down and as we have seen in most of his time here that virtually rules him out of the game, Vik looked knackered with his continual playing time and the rest of them looked as though they thought it was 3 weeks they had off instead of 2 !
Yeah how I saw it doyle and sheaf played well and Dabo livelyThought I’d share these ratings as they made me giggle:
View attachment 28923
Some of the pass completion stats are startling:
McNally 55%
Bidwell 60%
Godden 47%
Yeah how I saw it doyle and sheaf played well and Dabo lively
The fact that Dabo shows for the ball more means he gets it more and then mostly looks like a headless chicken.
We really need our midfielders to turn on the ball and look both sides.
To be fair though Stoke pressed so quickly no one seem to have any time on the ball.
As I say most on here agree it’s you whose biased and support my view
The fact that Dabo shows for the ball more means he gets it more and then mostly looks like a headless chicken.
We really need our midfielders to turn on the ball and look both sides.
To be fair though Stoke pressed so quickly no one seem to have any time on the ball.
I have t ask there’s a lot on here given Ben Wilson 4 a number of players on 5 one point higher, now I’m not saying he was anywhere near an 8 or 9 but for him we would have gone in 4-0 down, he was playing behind a woeful defence he had to come for all sorts of situations the defenders should have sorted was he mom probably a 6 out of 10 so yes in my opinion.
9
Yeah I’m not sure how you can rank him as our best player when you gave ten other players a higher mark!Thinking about it on that basis 4 does seem a bit harsh but he did still ship 4 goals. Perhaps up him to a 5.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?