SISU are used to being cosy with administrators aren't they, its their field of regular play for them. This individual sounds like a spokesman not someone who is totally impartial !!
His comments don't make sense though. It should be easy to tell who has the share. Surely. Did we ask the football league to move it? Yes or no? If yes when? If no oops! If recently have we paperwork to say it was ok? If not oops
SISU are used to being cosy with administrators aren't they, its their field of regular play for them. This individual sounds like a spokesman not someone who is totally impartial !!
Obviously he has been doing the job since last thursday surely he should know a simple question " where is the football league share "
Well, no one else seems to either. ACL or the FL.
Really guys? Why the beef with this guy? Christ sake...we've been complaining that someone needs to mediate between the two sides of the ongoing playground debate and when someone does (and keeps the fans updated), they're berated??
Jesus wept.....
WM
Well, no one else seems to either. ACL or the FL.
And today accepted by ACL?:claping hands:
David Rubin his partner?
Well, no one else seems to either. ACL or the FL.
Well he doesn't know where the Golden Share is, despite the FL telling us where it is as far as they are concerned? Bit worrying, that, no?
To which they have no choice?
Off course they do/did. They had the perfect opportunity to raise an objection at the high court today. They didn't. They has asked for an adjournment from Friday until today as "There may be issues about the viability of the appointment of administrator." If they uncovered any issues, they would've made them clear today.
The lack of questionning this today suggests that they're fine with the current administrator, no?
WM
Off course they do/did. They had the perfect opportunity to raise an objection at the high court today. They didn't. They has asked for an adjournment from Friday until today as "There may be issues about the viability of the appointment of administrator." If they uncovered any issues, they would've made them clear today.
The lack of questionning this today suggests that they're fine with the current administrator, no?
WM
On paper, yes. But I've not seen an official statement from the FL confirming this. Have you???
Maybe ACL see arguing over the administrator is yet another hurdle standing between our current situation and conclusion? The Football League, for example, have a view on where the Golden Share resides. Maybe ACL have confidence that any officer of the court, faced with compelling evidence will find in their favour immaterial?
Maybe ACL see arguing over the administrator is yet another hurdle standing between our current situation and conclusion? The Football League, for example, have a view on where the Golden Share resides. Maybe ACL have confidence that any officer of the court, faced with compelling evidence will find in their favour immaterial?
As secured creditor ARVO (ie SISU) appoint the administrator.
Quite possibly, but the fact remains having requested the adjournment they have now informed the court they are happy to proceed with the appointed administrator suggesting there are no major concerns.
He is an officer of the court when all said and done. Suggestions by some that he is in bed with SISU are premature to say the least.
Are you refuting what's been reported? Is Appleton? He isn't clear on that...
I agree no conspiracy just come on!! Wise upFrom my perspective it's not that he's in bed with SISU, but he's sounding a bit incompetent if he's going against what the FL have said regarding the location of the Golden Share. That maybe because he only knows what SISU have told him.
Well, no one else seems to either. ACL or the FL.
From my perspective it's not that he's in bed with SISU, but he's sounding a bit incompetent if he's going against what the FL have said regarding the location of the Golden Share. That maybe because he only knows what SISU have told him.
No mention of finding new prospective buyers of the club
Bit slow on here, nobody come up with "CrAppleton" to go with "Wisher" and "Faggot" yet?
Can't wait til "Fuckoffman" and "Smelliott" take over with Preston "Ordinary Boy" Hatchet.
A few of my thoughts...
1. In Appleton we MUST trust. I believe he legally has to be seen to act independently & fairly within his remit.
2. Commercially he'd be a bit stupid to do anything other than be independent. He & his company cannot rely on SISU as their only future source on business. If seen to be not impartial...he'd lose his own & his company's credibility & that would mean an awful lot of challenges to his/their appointment.
3. I think he's currently sitting on the fence on every issue since he has only really had ONE working day so far. Two have been taken up with courtroom shenanigans & probably awaiting answers to initial questions.
4. EVEN on the golden share issue...for now he's on the fence as the FA/FL rules do not override company law (although they try to operate within it) & if SISU have been seeking out little loopholes they might have found one that legally cannot be argued against that works either for them or for the club.
5. Latest statements are now starting to appear to me to suggest ACL are feeling very confident that they are in a position to drive through a winning outcome...whilst TF appears either flummoxed & completely baffled as to what is where & owned by who (i.e. feeling lost/out of his depth/let-down/misled) OR thinks the writing is on the wall. (All IMO)
6. I still don't give a FF about all this...I just want to watch my beloved Sky Blues play football wherever & at whatever level with its basic identity intact...I am the same as this in any situation - although its a rarity for me - I'm feeling really angry, like the world is against me/us...& that's when I come out fighting.
Lets get behind this Appleton bloke, for now at least he seems like our best bet as IF this Haskell chappie is our (next) saviour - Appleton is the main influence in his deal gaining acceptance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?