Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Appealing the red (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter SkyBlueDom26
  • Start date Oct 7, 2019
Forums New posts

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #1
Any ideas if we can appeal it?? Defiantly wasn't a foul let alone a red card!!! Fucking shite refereeing as usual
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #2
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Any ideas if we can appeal it?? Defiantly wasn't a foul let alone a red card!!! Shocking officials as usual
Click to expand...

I thought they changed the rules a couple of seasons ago, where if they gave a penalty, you no longer automatically receive a red card for a last man challenge?
 
Reactions: sw88, rob9872 and SkyBlueDom26

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #3
ccfc92 said:
I thought they changed the rules a couple of seasons ago, where if they gave a penalty, you no longer automatically receive a red card for a last man challenge?
Click to expand...
Exactly, mate it was never a foul in a million years, its clearly shoulder to shoulder and the Rotherham player throws himself on the floor... should have been booked for diving
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #4
Should only be a red now if deemed that it was a deliberate foul & not an honest attempt to play the ball. Red was harsh imo.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueDom26 and ccfc92

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #5
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Exactly, mate it was never a foul in a million years, its clearly shoulder to shoulder and the Rotherham player throws himself on the floor... should have been booked for diving
Click to expand...

Tbh, it was just a stinker of a performance all round. I wasn't surprised that two penalties and a red card given against us.
 
Reactions: sw88 and SkyBlueDom26

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #6
ccfc92 said:
Tbh, it was just a stinker of a performance all round. I wasn't surprised that two penalties and a red card given against us.
Click to expand...
4th goal completely summed the game up!
 
Reactions: sw88 and ccfc92

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #7
I wouldn't appeal as it'd be forcing someone to watch our defending which seems cruel, ideally all footage of Saturday would be incinerated.
 
Reactions: sw88, DannyThomas_1981 and peace ndlovu

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #8
ajsccfc said:
I wouldn't appeal as it'd be forcing someone to watch our defending which seems cruel, ideally all footage of Saturday would be incinerated.
Click to expand...
We need him back alongside rose for Sunday though... thats the partnership that was working best
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #9
Trouble is if we appeal and it’s rejected don’t they increase the ban by a game.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Harry H

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #10
Hopefully he don’t win the appeal we don’t need anymore of that crap next game
 
Reactions: sw88 and skyblueheaven

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #11
SkyBlueDom26 said:
We need him back alongside rose for Sunday though... thats the partnership that was working best
Click to expand...
Hyam is the best centre back at the club mate he is ahead of McFadz for me
 
Reactions: skyblueheaven and ccfcrob

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #12
cc84cov said:
Hyam is the best centre back at the club mate he is ahead of McFadz for me
Click to expand...
Hyam is excellent but the partnership of Rose and Mcfadz was working the best
 
Reactions: sw88

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #13
cc84cov said:
Hopefully he don’t win the appeal we don’t need anymore of that crap next game
Click to expand...
Harsh, he's been our best defender up until Saturday.... Hyam had a shocker too giving them the 4th goal
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #14
It was a foul, it was a deliberate attempt to stop the player. Pointless appealing.
 
Reactions: skyblueelephant76, OffenhamSkyBlue and cc84cov

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #15
fernandopartridge said:
It was a foul, it was a deliberate attempt to stop the player. Pointless appealing.
Click to expand...
It was literally shoulder to shoulder which i thought was allowed in football! He didn't push into him or trip him up!! One of the worst decisions I've seen
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #16
My rotherham season ticket friend in front of their goal said they were howling with laughter that the pen got given and he got sent off. Said it was neither. They also howled at how dogshit mcfadz was but that's a fair assessment
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #17
If it's a one game ban then probably not worth appealing it.
 
Reactions: Colin Steins Smile

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #18
Robins said on the radio after that we can't appeal
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #19
skybluegod said:
Robins said on the radio after that we can't appeal
Click to expand...

Why?
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #20
ccfc92 said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Because if we win, we'll have to play him on the tele where the whole country will see!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: sw88, skyblueheaven, vow and 3 others

better days

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #21
no_loyalty said:
If it's a one game ban then probably not worth appealing it.
Click to expand...
If the ref said it was a professional foul to stop a goal-scoring opportunity then it's just a one game ban
 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #22
Only seen once on tv and looked like he deliberately tripped him so that would make it a red as not trying to play ball.
 

better days

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #23
speedie87 said:
Only seen once on tv and looked like he deliberately tripped him so that would make it a red as not trying to play ball.
Click to expand...
Could still be a one game ban
Violent or dangerous play is a 3 game ban, dissent is 2 games
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #24
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Harsh, he's been our best defender up until Saturday.... Hyam had a shocker too giving them the 4th goal
Click to expand...
Agree he looked better with Rose but he’s been making mistakes most games his passing is woeful at times he give them 2 goals Saturday 1 against Pompey it’s not good enough mate Hyam & Rose I hope will become our pairing.
 
Reactions: win9nut and SkyBlueDom26
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #25
skybluegod said:
Robins said on the radio after that we can't appeal
Click to expand...
he only said that because he thought it was 2 yellows . he didnt realise it was a straight red
 
Reactions: skybluegod

AStonesThrow

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #26
Swear most referees/linesman forget it's a contact sport. Next thing you know we'll have tag football
 
Reactions: SkyBlueDom26
K

KeresleyArmpit

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 7, 2019
  • #27
He needs a stadium ban for a few games regardless of whether he’s suspended or not.
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #28
It was a foul and he was last man. It wad a red card.

Move on.

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #29
skyblue1991 said:
It was a foul and he was last man. It wad a red card.

Move on.

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You might want to read the rules
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #30
Skybluefaz said:
You might want to read the rules
Click to expand...

He’s right though. As McFadz didn’t attempt to play the ball it had to be a red. The ‘double jeopardy’ ruling only applies if it is felt the foul is a result of a genuine attempt to play the ball.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #31
On that performance I’d appeal for a longer ban!
 
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #32
The art of the "shoulder to shoulder" challenge has been lost in recent years (or certainly the ability to referee it has). Most of the time, it is one player barging the other off the ball with the shoulder, which is a foul. There is no benefit for the attacking player to try and win the ball by going for a shoulder to shoulder, as if they fall over in response to a shoulder barge, they'll get a free kick or penalty.
 

Mild-Mannered Janitor

Kindest Bloke on CCFC / Maker of CCFC Dreams
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #33
Magwitch said:
Trouble is if we appeal and it’s rejected don’t they increase the ban by a game.
Click to expand...
That could be a positive......
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #34
SBAndy said:
He’s right though. As McFadz didn’t attempt to play the ball it had to be a red. The ‘double jeopardy’ ruling only applies if it is felt the foul is a result of a genuine attempt to play the ball.
Click to expand...
Yeah but that's not what was said was it. It isn't simply last man + foul = red anymore.
 

skyblueelephant76

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 8, 2019
  • #35
SkyBlueDom26 said:
It was literally shoulder to shoulder which i thought was allowed in football! He didn't push into him or trip him up!! One of the worst decisions I've seen
Click to expand...
He pushed him clearly with his left arm, it was no where near shoulder to shoulder. It was a clear pen and sending off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?