Another nice positive article in the CT (2 Viewers)

armybike said:

So that's two of you that will be offering an opinion piece to the Telegraph then?

The reads would definitely be aware of the situation once they've read them.

Click to expand...

If I did an opinion piece, I would make sure I had my facts right, even if people didn't agree with my opinion on them.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

stupot07 said:

If I did an opinion piece, I would make sure I had my facts right, even if people didn't agree with my opinion on them.

Click to expand...

Why not do one then?

armybike said:

Why not do one then?

Click to expand...

I might do next season.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Juggy's given some facts, thrown out some figures, and sure there are some holes if you are trying to reconstruct a balance sheet. But I get his frustration. What would be helpful was if our owners were a little less secretive, then this would cut out the need for speculation. My main gripe with their player transactions is that of not being very good at obtaining the best price for players (my opinion). I get tired of hearing the excuse that 'we can't stand in the way of player x' so we have to let him go. I find it strange that they are so prepared to play hardball in almost every other facet of their business dealings, yet always seem to blink at the first sign of an offer for a player. I accept that may just be my perspective and that they really work a deal behind the scenes, but I haven't been convinced with our recent sales.

armybike said:

So that's two of you that will be offering an opinion piece to the Telegraph then?

The readers would definitely be aware of the situation once they've read them.

Click to expand...

Doesn't Juggy write frequently for the CET?

Why do you keep boring everyone with the same comment all the time?

oldskyblue58 said:

simple answer is it shouldn't NW. It would also need to be disclosed in the notes to the accounts as a contingent asset and it isn't.

Click to expand...

My understanding is Contingent Assets are only disclosed as such when the Directors are satisfied the economic benefit is probable
I think CCFC have one or two transferees playing at Derby and they get an uplift if Derby are promoted. When do we think that is "probable" ?

Grendel said:

Doesn't Juggy write frequently for the CET?

WHY DO YOU KEEP BORING EVERYONE WITH THE SAME COMMENT ALL THE TIME?

Click to expand...

1st sign of madness.

oldskyblue58 said:

Over the 8 year period you would expect the staggered payments to even it out so that some years reversed it. That does not happen. There was no difference in 2013 in 2014 it was (5436) in 2015 74036

Yes you would expect auditors to get it right. But then you would expect them to know the difference between a trading company and property company or to know who owned which assets wouldn't you

Click to expand...

How does it work out if you get not all cash, but a player or loan player as part of the deal?