D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
When the site went down for maintenance.
Since when has anyone been in agreement on here?
Is because I replied to him about stuff and disagreed with stuffJust seen this as well...he's watching. Hello LBB!
Juggy Chima @JuggyChima 3h3 hours ago
Looks like the Sky Blue Talk forum admin and the owners are in agreement. Well, I'll decline to join that merry 'little' band
Here? Twitter? Telegraph website?There's some really ranty angry comments
Here? Twitter? Telegraph website?
All of the above?
What do you mean?Still nothing?
I mean about what I said above, would you not agree the thread changed tack after that post.Did anyone else notice,
This thread completely lost it's way at 1-47 this afternoon.
The same time OSB58 pointed out an anomaly in the accounts.
Funny that,
Two days of posts about the accounts, and then it's Juggy's a Lemo bootboy.
:angelic:
Didn't notice anything different to usual to be honest.I mean about what I said above, would you not agree the thread changed tack after that post.
Really,Didn't notice anything different to usual to be honest.
yes why, have you a problem with that?Really,
It would be funny if Kieran was actually employed by sisu, but hes not he's employed by CCFC....In reply to Kieran Crowley
Juggy Chima @JuggyChima 26m26 minutes ago
@KieranCrowley1 @SkyBluesTalk @CovTel_CCFC A SISU employee accuses me of 'back of a fag packet' accounting. Priceless
i did find this funny
whatever mate, i found it funny. my opinionIt would be funny if Kieran was actually employed by sisu, but hes not he's employed by CCFC....
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The op is about Juggy and his article so that's on topic.I mean about what I said above, would you not agree the thread changed tack after that post.
Posters who are always quick to point out why people are wrong to not trust SISUs accounting,Didn't notice anything different to usual to be honest.
It didn't follow the line of discussion the thread was on .The op is about Juggy and his article so that's on topic.
Posters who are always quick to point out why people are wrong to not trust SISUs accounting,
Then have no opinion at all about what OSB58 pointed out., just sailed on by like he never said it.
It didn't follow the line of discussion the thread was on .
Not really, I read it. OSB said he cant work out what the accounts mean but is sure there is an explanation for it. I'm sure if he said "look sisu are syphoning off money here's the proof" then we would be discussing that, not Juggys back of a fag packet maths that have absolutely no merit.Posters who are always quick to point out why people are wrong to not trust SISUs accounting,
Then have no opinion at all about what OSB58 pointed out., just sailed on by like he never said it.
Get back to your tower block mates , how do you find the time ,It's a nice try council boy but you look even more of a moron than you usually do
No he said he can't account for that 1 anomaly in the accounts, stressed there's probably anNot really, I read it. OSB said he cant work out what the accounts mean but is sure there is an explanation for it. I'm sure if he said "look sisu are syphoning off money here's the proof" then we would be discussing that, not Juggys back of a fag packet maths that have absolutely no merit.
Did you comment on osbs post other then the "look no ones noticed"? If you have bi opinion about what OSB has posted why do you expect everyone to?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Discus.So here is the anomaly
Cash flow statements indicate how actual cash has been utilised in the business - ie non cash accounting adjustments like depreciation are excluded
Player calculated sales total 15.9m. The profit on those sales as declared in the accounts 13.72m. The entries on the cash flow statements 2008 to 2015 total 12.76m actually received. Difference Calculated sales to cash flow total is 3.15m
(calculated sale price is original cost less accumulated amortisation plus the profit)
Player purchases 7.86m. The entries on the cash flow statements actually paid out 7.26m
Shouldn't the cost on the balance sheet of players bought equal the figure on the cash flow statement (some years it did) ?
Shouldn't, even allowing for staged payments and add ons cash received even out to pretty much the same figure as sales value?
2012 calculated value of Player sales 3.19m figure on cash flow statement 935K
Some years there was no difference
I cant explain it but sure there will be a reason. Perhaps I am looking at it wrongly. No I am not saying anything is wrong only that I do not understand the entries
If OSB, who has studied the accounts in great detail, doesn't know how is anyone else going to know?No he said he can't account for that 1 anomaly in the accounts, stressed there's probably an
explanation for it ( could well be ) I just wondered why people who are normally so diligent
Completely glossed over it . That's all
If OSB, who has studied the accounts in great detail, doesn't know how is anyone else going to know?
You could flip your question round and ask why OSB raised it now (not suggesting anything to be clear just saying its not a big deal).
I'm not an acountant so I'm probably wrong , but doesn't that look like money is unaccounted forIf OSB, who has studied the accounts in great detail, doesn't know how is anyone else going to know?
You could flip your question round and ask why OSB raised it now (not suggesting anything to be clear just saying its not a big deal).
I'm not an acountant so I'm probably wrong , but doesn't that look like money is unaccounted for
Like I say I'm probably wrong, would be handy if OSB 58 came on to explain what it means.
It's just the sort of thing people on here usually discuss.
And we will do when he works it out what it means and explains it to us. Otherwise some will go "look it proves they take money out", some will say " look I told you we were paying for court costs" with no actual proof that's what's happened.I'm not an acountant so I'm probably wrong , but doesn't that look like money is unaccounted for
Like I say I'm probably wrong, would be handy if OSB 58 came on to explain what it means.
It's just the sort of thing people on here usually discuss.
In reply to Kieran Crowley
Juggy Chima @JuggyChima 26m26 minutes ago
@KieranCrowley1 @SkyBluesTalk @CovTel_CCFC A SISU employee accuses me of 'back of a fag packet' accounting. Priceless
i did find this funny
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?