Nick
Administrator
Think we're up there still
Think we're up there stillDidn't someone go through all the clubs and ours are still on of the cheapest?
£25000 i believe, not a great deal for the money received mind from our previous sales
So where did you get £25K from?as with all of Sisu;s dealings, its undisclosed so we will never know, £300k from Charlton so you are nearer the mark
I'm thinking he's basing that on the other day it was predicted our turnover for the coming season would be £5-5.5 million. Yet we've been told our budget will be the same which will be £2-2.5 million.Hes just tweeted we only pay 40% of our turnover on wages, his the hell he knows I'll never know, the last accounts 14/15 say our turnover was around £4.7m and staffing costs were £5m.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
But he's gone from that to saying that SISU are taking millions out. Someone needs to tell him turnover and profit aren't the same.I'm thinking he's basing that on the other day it was predicted our turnover for the coming season would be £5-5.5 million. Yet we've been told our budget will be the same which will be £2-2.5 million.
Yea wasn't commenting on that, just responding about his tweet about only 40% of income being spent.But he's gone from that to saying that SISU are taking millions out. Someone needs to tell him turnover and profit aren't the same.
heard it when we got him on loan with the option to buy him, didnt bother checking it out, as he was from Dagenham and Redbridge i didnt expect it to be £300kSo where did you get £25K from?
I'm thinking he's basing that on the other day it was predicted our turnover for the coming season would be £5-5.5 million. Yet we've been told our budget will be the same which will be £2-2.5 million.
So rather than being in the know he's just drawing conclusion from the number that have been reported.
But he's gone from that to saying that SISU are taking millions out. Someone needs to tell him turnover and profit aren't the same.
Plus the £2-2.5m in my mind was just the playing budget, theres a lot more wages to be paid, stewards, manager and coaching staff, medical staff, groundsman at Ricoh, tea lady, backroom staff, etc, before you look at all the other stuff.
You're right, I'm just speculating at where he could have got the 40% figure and my guess is that is what he is basing it onPlus the £2-2.5m in my mind was just the playing budget, theres a lot more wages to be paid, stewards, manager and coaching staff, medical staff, groundsman at Ricoh, tea lady, backroom staff, etc, before you look at all the other stuff.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Oh dear, I think that's why people don't like places like here. Because people don't just believe the shite all the time.
He was saying since league one I think, we got a fee for ClarkePoorly written and researched. Clearly 'Juggy' doesnt remember the transfers of McKenzie and Eastwood in, as well as Jones. Wasn't Deegan released, and Jordan Clarke/Daniels too?
However, it's been lapped up on the Telegraph Facebook page, and will produce lots of clicks for the website.
Jim Brown I think has greatest grasp on facts that Juggy, but that wouldn't be as popular a story...
To be fair, you're right there. Point still stands on rest of it though!He was saying since league one I think, we got a fee for Clarke
Hes just tweeted we only pay 40% of our turnover on wages, his the hell he knows I'll never know, the last accounts 14/15 say our turnover was around £4.7m and staffing costs were £5m.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
WASPS / JLR ? pay more for advertising?I don't hate the CT for a start, just wish they would support our club. And its not like we have numerous options as far as local media goes.
Has anyone disproved it though people are asking for proof yet give none themself.It's just a shame this will be taken as fact as usual
Has anyone disproved it though people are asking for proof yet give none themself.
I for one don't give a fuck it will all come out one day, one way or the other. .
If it's full of errors and incorrect facts, then yes
But where do you draw the line? Could I have a piece about the EDL march today saying 5,000 of them turned up all dressed up as Hitler goose-stepping around town?But it's a bloke writing in isn't it
Bit an official journalist doing a report?
Did he just miss a 0?So where did you get £25K from?
But where do you draw the line? Could I have a piece about the EDL march today saying 5,000 of them turned up all dressed up as Hitler goose-stepping around town?
Is his point that far fetched?
The club is running at a loss, SISU had to put more money in this season to cover the shortfall and also Maddison had to be sold. How do you get from there to SISU taking out millions?
Only a little bit was paid back wasnt it?I don't agree with the article let me get that straight.
However they put in 750k which was paid back very quickly via the sale of Maddison. Maddison was not sold for 750k
Maddison's money is to go to future season yet our transfer budget is the same and ticket prices have gone up in order to sort out the void from last season's mistake regarding the break even figure?
Only a little bit was paid back wasnt it?
Yeah but didn't they only pay back a bit?Oh, I thought it was the lot?
So has all the Maddision money got to go on paying back the loan?
I thought the loan was only £750,000?
Yeah but didn't they only pay back a bit?
That's the oneAccording to the notes to the May 15 accounts they put in £780k, and had £250k back sometime before end of Feb 16 which was when the accounts were signed.
That's the one
Where's that come from?Ah ok so effectively they put in let's say an extra 800k
Another 550k is still outstanding
Season ticket prices have gone up in order to cover the mistake made made last season.
So unles the increase in season ticket sales doesn't cover it. Are we saying we only got 800k before add ons for Maddison?
Why bother?Where's that come from?
Am I missing something or areWhere's that come from?
Where's that come from?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?