Oops
He is right about the stadium though
Should have built it in Cov. Would have saved at least 500 million....
Good. He fell for a deliberate set-up & attempt to discredit him & the FA. That appears to be his only 'crime'. This was done with scant regard for damage that may be caused to the national team.He won't get sacked. The FA are spineless and will find some pretext for backing him.
Show us one that isn't - Wenger might be an exception but by & large they are just people - spot a mug with easy money on offer & most of us would jump inStill shows him up to be a dodgy greedy idiot though doesn't it......
...although I suppose we all knew that much already....
Should have built it in Cov. Would have saved at least 500 million....
Show us one that isn't - Wenger might be an exception but by & large they are just people - spot a mug with easy money on offer & most of us would jump in
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Singled him out as he has been in the game with a top club for so many years & I dont recall seeing anything relating to dodgy stuff with him directly involved beyond allegation
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Does he not state throughout this meeting that he would have to run any deal past the F.A. Also when they mention paying players, managers and agents he tells them to shut up and not have that conversation while he is there. From what I have seen there is not enough here to sack him, and he doesn't come out of it too bad.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Interesting point. If you run an agency employing 10 agents how is that different from employing one agent?I'm not clued up on agents in football but is this not normal practice anyway? Not all football agents are self employed are they? A lot of agents would work on behalf of a company wouldn't they?
That is what third party ownership is, its banned now in the UK. Allardyce even says in the video you can't do that now.Interesting point. If you run an agency employing 10 agents how is that different from employing one agent?
That's not what I would have thought third party ownership was anyway. I thought that was more along the lines of someone funding a transfer, so say someone giving us the money to buy Jones, but they get the profit when he is sold on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?