He most certainly isn't a DM. Jennings is a DM.
Clarke is a ST
He most certainly isn't a DM. Jennings is a DM.
Clarke is a ST
At least he isn't an SBT. It'd get really confusing around here with all these SBTs. Can you imagine SBT on SBT talking about how the SBT, after taking over the club, can't afford to give our top-scoring SBT a new contract.
Okay. What am I missing? I got Taylor, trust, and talk but can't work out what we're describing LC as!
Okay. What am I missing? I got Taylor, trust, and talk but can't work out what we're describing LC as!
That was confusing!
I'm SBT, a member on SBT, who talks about the SBT on SBT!
When making by username, I didn't think it could make it quite confusing!
As if this is a positive thread from Glen! World's gone mad
No, I'm SBT.
Otis was saying Clarke was an ST(riker). I was saying it was good he wasn't an SBT or it would get even more confusing. It's like Have I Got News for You's odd one out round. All the others are SBTs (Taylor, Trust and Talk) but Clarke was the odd one out as he is only an ST.
And when Glen talks of DM he obviously means Defensive Midfielder ......... or Depeche Mode ........ or David Mitchell ....... or Davina Mcall .... or Darth Maul.
As far as I am aware though, LC (Leon Clarke) is not an ST holder (Season Ticket) who is a member of the SBT (Sky Blue Trust) who posts on SBT (Sky Blues Talk) with SBT (Sky Blue Taylor).
Clear now?
You're forgetting SBT, who has also replied to this thread on SBT in which SBT has engaged in the discussion about how Clarke is not an SBT but an ST, though not a DM or ST, and in which the existence of the SBT has also been mentioned.
Yes a positive post from me. Clarke is not DM but he is the best we could afford and honestly he wants a club to settle at, will be proud to wear the shirt and honestly he will score a few, not lots, but enough at this level. So leave him alone
What, because he scored a tap in?
worked for Gary Lineker, Robbie Fowler, Michael Owen, Ian Rush etc
No, Im not comparing Clarke to any of those, but fact is he has already scored 2 goals for us this season. Only one behind Elliott, Ball and Cody, who have all been here all season !
What, because he scored a tap in?
Will we ever see Clarke score the calibre of goals that Owen and fowler used to score? Dint think so!!Far more than just tap ins! Don't think we can judge him either way yet to be honest
He has to be in the right position to score the tap in you weapon. He's got brilliant movement and he'll score a load of goals. I'm willing to bet they won't all be tap ins either. And so what if they are? A goal is a goal.
Edit: are you on a wind up? Got to check
! Don't think we can judge him either way yet to be honest
If we paid Owen or Fowler money for a striker I would expect their goals. We got him for free. A very good freebie. As I lived near Scunny for nearly 20 years and having a lot of family that way I also know some Scunny fans. Their season was more or less over when he left. A lot of us saw what he did against us. Yet some still question how good he is.
How many at the game thought he was crap when he scored twice against us for Scunny to beat us? How many would have liked him to join us then? How many thought he was the difference between losing and winning that day? Remember we were on a good run until that day and have been on a decent run since.
Shall we all try getting behind him and see what he can do for us?
But you're doing it anyway!
Because I'm not going nuts about a tap in like the op? He's got my full backing, just not seen much to get excited about as yet, that's all.
Stop slating him
Are you in a bad mood this morning?
The post title is like a full on masturbation because he scored a tap in last night!
I'm on the fence at the min, I think he will do well eventually, he looks like he's got the ability but we are yet to see what he can do.
I'm allowed an opinion mate. Just like the op,yourself and everyone else.
Ah I see! WUM!
Because I'm not going nuts about a tap in like the op? He's got my full backing, just not seen much to get excited about as yet, that's all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?