Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Alex McLeish leaves Birmingham (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Chipfat
  • Start date Jun 12, 2011
Forums New posts
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #1
Quit Brum for the Villa
 

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #2
be a shame if the new manager does not like you know who..and he does not get a game
 

Ernie Machin

New Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #3
On 18k a week for the next 3 years, I'm sure he'll survive.
 

Coventry La La La

New Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #4
Hopefully there next manager doesn't have Marlon King in his plans.
 

Sky Blue Sheepy

New Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #5
Maybe it's actually because of Marlon?
 
C

crowsnest

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #6
Kings has only signed a pre contract agreement - he probably thinks that doesn't count and can sign for villa (he's not very good on english law)
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #7
Boothroyd to brum
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #8
what is going on in the 2nd city .......... not that i am crying over it. Birmingham seem in turmoil ..... hardly a team likely to mount a serious challenge as it stands
- lost the 4 loan players
- 10 players out of contract
- other teams looking to buy Johnson, Dann and Jerome
- owners apparently looking to limit the transfer pot

or is it that MK has turned up there

resigned by email apparently which seems a little cowardly

Is good to see the turmoil at another club for a change especially a local rival
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #9
King has only got a pre-contract agreement in place you are right in that assumption.
This could be a game changer for Marlon King.
Oh boy how many would enjoy that when it turns out he was Mc.Leish's pick and they refuse to follow through now??!!!!!
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #10
Paxman II said:
King has only got a pre-contract agreement in place you are right in that assumption.
This could be a game changer for Marlon King.
Oh boy how many would enjoy that when it turns out he was Mc.Leish's pick and they refuse to follow through now??!!!!!
Click to expand...

if that happens i would love it if we refused to even speak to him, then hopefully nobody else would take a punt on him after seeing what hes like in this past week.
 
D

Deleted member 162

Guest
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #11
I would cry manly joyous tears for days if that happened
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #12
Paxman II said:
King has only got a pre-contract agreement in place you are right in that assumption.
This could be a game changer for Marlon King.
Oh boy how many would enjoy that when it turns out he was Mc.Leish's pick and they refuse to follow through now??!!!!!
Click to expand...
This would be class
But could this feasibly happen now? Them not following through with the deal?
 
S

smileycov

Facebook User
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #13
Now this would be a dilema, do we cut our nose off to spite our face? i personnaly would still happily take MK back.

Clutching at straws though, would be interesting to see if it was the board stalling on him after all, and see what they did.
 

TheParsonsHose

Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #14
He has signed for Birmingham what proof do you have about a Pre contract ?
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #15
All over the press at the time. Not sure why but is his contract with City till July 1st?
 
S

smileycov

Facebook User
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #16
I thought it was yea!
 
S

Sky_Blue_Vickie

New Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #17
Paxman II said:
All over the press at the time. Not sure why but is his contract with City till July 1st?
Click to expand...

I had been thinking how had he signed for them before 1st July but that makes sense that.

Would be hilarious if that happened. Suppose it depends who wanted MK. Did McLeish want him and in which case might be in trouble, if it was higher than McLeish and he didn't want him and so that is one of reasons why he has resigned then it will make no difference - although nothing to say that new manager will actually want / play him.

Funny to see we are not the only club with issues. :claping hands:
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • #18
Chipfat said:
Quit Brum for the Villa
Click to expand...

From Mercia's website:

Acting chairman Peter Pannu has said he received an e-mail resignation from McLeish earlier today while away on business in Amsterdam.


Pannu has also exclusively told Mercia Head of Sport Tom Ross that he does not give Alex McLeish permission to talk to any club as he is still a Birmingham City Football Club contracted staff member. Pannu also says he is speaking to his legal team.
Click to expand...
 

Il Pirata

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2011
  • #19
McLeish wanted 6 defenders this summer. Yeung came back with Marlon King. McLeish "I said 6 defenders, not sex offenders"
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2011
  • #20
Lol at the Birmingham board accusing McLiesh of betrayal, it is not nice to be on the receiving is it?

I hope what ever manager comes in lets King rot in the reserves and then he gets a long term injury for good measure:laugh:
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 14, 2011
  • #21
A statement released by Villa on Tuesday Evening said: ‘The Club understands that Alex McLeish is a free agent. We therefore intend to interview him imminently in order to make a decision regarding his candidacy to become Villa manager.
Click to expand...

A statement released by Birmingham City on Tuesday Evening said: ““The situation regarding Alex McLeish is now in the hands of lawyers. It’s not appropriate to disclose anything further at this moment in time and we will update supporters with the progress as soon as we can”
Click to expand...

Both quotes from Mercia Sound's website.

Could anything be funnier than a public slanging match between Brumagem and the Villa?
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #22
BBC said earlier they were decisions he was very unhappy about recently and many other problems that made him consider his job untenable.

Well well, one of those I must assume to be the signing of King. Can't have been a McLeish signing as he was already considering his position surely? he had just released Philips who in this league may have returned as many as King could? So maybe the straw that broke the camels back? The fans are in uproar about it (as we were last year) and McLeish would have been saddled with that moral standard against his own interest maybe?

Arh well precontracted king just might see him with no club at all!
 
Last edited: Jun 15, 2011

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #23
Think the transfer that probably broke the camels back was more likely that Johnson & Dann are likely to be sold..... but like you say it could have involved "he who shall remain nameless"

Do find it slightly irritating that Pannu gets his knickers in a twist about McLeish being tapped up when they blatantly were involved in tapping up one of our players who was still under contract
 

Disorganised1

New Member
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #24
Permission to laugh out loud and whoop ridiculously, sir ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?