Acting out of pure malice (2 Viewers)

Old Warwickshire lad · Sep 30, 2016

Nick said:
Is it defending them to say they aren't doing it to be spiteful, they just don't really know what they are doing?

They know exactly what they are doing. Ok it might not be out of spite but they are now selling everything they can find before liquidating us.
The best we can hope for is they say we have had all we can get, now the cupboard is bare you can have it.

Deleted member 2477 · Sep 30, 2016

I said this a few months a go and got shot down by the usual faces on here. Well it seems the truth will shortly come out

dongonzalos · Sep 30, 2016

It's not spiteful. It's bad advice IMO.

They are getting advised by solicitors who are making money whilst the legal action continues. .
They are also getting advised by people who take a salary whilst we still they own the club.

Whilst some experts are telling you what you want to hear, that is sometimes an easier route to go than the route that is best for you, but not the direction you would prefer to go. Just my opinion.

robbieray · Sep 30, 2016

Otis said:
At the moment I am a bit pinky with blotches.

Mr blobby

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT · Sep 30, 2016

Westendlad said:
Can someone remind me how bad the club was being run before sisu took over...........Joe Elliot begging for fans to sell their shares etc......

Hindsight's a wonderful thing.

Go now Fisher, Go now SISU, we don't want you here. :finger:

ceetee · Sep 30, 2016

Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
Now you put it that way that's ok then

I didn't say it was OK
I want them out as long as it is to the benefit of the club; I don't want to see the club killed to get at SISU
I was just pointing out that we should not think of them as football club owners and not try to attack them using football related methods.
Understand your enemy

Otis · Oct 1, 2016

Otis said:
To me he looks like an evil Cary Grant.

Hmm, obviously no-one believes me.

SkyblueBazza · Oct 1, 2016

Jimmy Hill's Chin said:
My broader point is this, what more evidence can be required for the FA to step in and say our owners are deliberately damaging the club?

Why would they do that? It would serve no purpose other than make SISU even less cooperative.
The FA can't force someone to sell their owned club. The government can...but they would only do so in extreme cases such as where a monopoly is developing...airports I seem to remember BAA were directed to sell 3 or 4 a few years back.

...onwards & upwards PUSB

Acting out of pure malice (2 Viewers)

Old Warwickshire lad

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 2477

Guest

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

robbieray

Well-Known Member

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member

ceetee

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Acting out of pure malice (2 Viewers)

Old Warwickshire lad

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 2477

Guest

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

robbieray

Well-Known Member

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member

ceetee

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency