ACL is not a charity nor is Sisu. Therefore ACL should agree to lose 90 percent of their earnings from the club for the next 12 months in return for shares of an equivalent value. By taking this approach the tax payer obtains the accounts and Sisu accept the commercial reality they find themselves in
You do know that the shares in the club has zero value, so even surrendering every share wouldn't equal much rent reduction.
And why would ACL be interested in become (part) owner of the debts to sisu?
You do know that the shares in the club has zero value, so even surrendering every share wouldn't equal much rent reduction.
And why would ACL be interested in become (part) owner of the debts to sisu?