Sick Boy
Super Moderator
I have never supported sisu unlike the vast majority on here. It seems if you aren't behind ACL, then you support SISU. Idiotic.
I blamed them for the appointment of Thorn, yet it was seen as a major coup by most on here.
And you lap up Sisu claiming the reason why we are 60 mill in debt is because of it and all decision made by them are council forced.. Sisu have blamed everyone for errors made even past board members who are now back in control ,,you lap that up aswell...Can't wait for text a sub , or KD standing with his clip board on the pitch might even get TF in a cov kit with a bucket collecting for a JS statue....
So the club would have been punished for attracting more supporters? It is hardly surprising we find ourselves where we are with fans who obviously don't have the club as their priority.
It is hard to understand what you have written but I will try.
It doesn't matter how the stadium is, we are quickly becoming an average League 1 club...it doesn't matter what the stadium is like if we can't afford it.
the stadium that you rent is a factor in the charges applied for example you ewouldnt pay 400, 000 per year for boundry park but for a olimpic stadium its a barginIt is hard to understand what you have written but I will try.
It doesn't matter how the stadium is, we are quickly becoming an average League 1 club...it doesn't matter what the stadium is like if we can't afford it.
Yes but the Football League requirements are for SISU to provide clear evidence that they have set in motion a credible plan to building a new ground,I'm not sure a 'back of a 'fag packet' drawing will suffice.They will have to convince the football league and more importantly the other clubs that their plans are credible.Where we play next year is immaterial to that requirement.I'm sure the FL will require a substantial up front bond of circa £1 million,to initially reassure the league of their intentions,similar to what Rotherham had to provide.
the stadium that you rent is a factor in the charges applied for example you ewouldnt pay 400, 000 per year for boundry park but for a olimpic stadium its a bargin
You cant see it can you 70 million debt minus 6 million rent =64 million debt we are in the third division because of SISU we get rid of them then we can talk about rent. By the way what stopped SISU investing the rent last season because they weren't paying it anyway.Take off the blinkers and see the truth SISu have raped this club and they still areBoth...they say the re-negotiated rent at the the Ricoh is too high for a League 1 club, yet out fans lap it up.
Can you point out the bit where I said 1.2 was a fair amount to pay and I fell behind? Or are we just shouting random points donny have to pay for the upkeep as well, and just cos someone else has a deel you cant shout that as a right walsall pay aprox 400, 000 is your ground wothth less?Doncaster pay £100,000 a year (actually for the next 10 years its £10,000) and get 100% control of all revenues -- so lets get this right are you saying the Ricoh in comparison is worth paying £1.2 million a year and no revenues? Are you demented? How about the City Ground, KFC, Portman Road -- shall we carry on or do you want to just give up when behind?
But you said....Doncaster pay £100,000 a year (actually for the next 10 years its £10,000) and get 100% control of all revenues -- so lets get this right are you saying the Ricoh in comparison is worth paying £1.2 million a year and no revenues? Are you demented? How about the City Ground, KFC, Portman Road -- shall we carry on or do you want to just give up when behind?
Doncaster are actually renting the entire stadium complex and therefore are entitled to all the revenues, profits and losses that the stadium generates. SISU/CCFC agreed heads of terms with the charity and then walked away, as far as I know never asked the council about their share and so rejected the opportunity to own the long lease that ACL have on the Ricoh. If they had bought ACL then the council might have been open to extending the lease on favourable terms but in a brilliant move they burnt all the bridges with the council.Grendel said:Why do you keep persisting with the smokescreen regarding Doncaster? The club have already stated the rent of £400,000 is fair. That's not an issue and you know it.
But you said....
Doncaster are actually renting the entire stadium complex and therefore are entitled to all the revenues, profits and losses that the stadium generates. SISU/CCFC agreed heads of terms with the charity and then walked away, as far as I know never asked the council about their share and so rejected the opportunity to own the long lease that ACL have on the Ricoh. If they had bought ACL then the council might have been open to extending the lease on favourable terms but in a brilliant move they burnt all the bridges with the council.
Can you point out the bit where I said 1.2 was a fair amount to pay and I fell behind? Or are we just shouting random points donny have to pay for the upkeep as well, and just cos someone else has a deel you cant shout that as a right walsall pay aprox 400, 000 is your ground wothth less?
Interesting? Unlike yourselfLOL. I said when posting this that I am sure James Smith would respond. So many posts all day James and yet the merest challenge to ACL and you are on like a shot. How interesting, how very interesting. One could say I set this post up just so you could respond. Yes it is very interesting.
Or maybe this is just the first time I have visited this site today, not everything is a conspiracy you know. I'm not defending ACL just pointing out that SISU have screwed our chances of owning the long lease that ACL have whilst they remain in control of CCFC through their amazing negotiating tactics, or do they think the word is spelt tictac?LOL. I said when posting this that I am sure James Smith would respond. So many posts all day James and yet the merest challenge to ACL and you are on like a shot. How interesting, how very interesting. One could say I set this post up just so you could respond. Yes it is very interesting.
Get an education and I will respond.
Interesting? Unlike yourself
Only when PSGMs not onWell that is strange, when something is of no interest then there would be no response -- yet you respond to me all the time -- so clearly I am of interest.
Only when PSGMs not on
He's easy, take all night to formulate a reply now or pretend he's ignoring me either way he is just a twatHave you not proved him to be a numpy yet so he decides not to reply to something he started shame on you bhsb
Both...they say the re-negotiated rent at the the Ricoh is too high for a League 1 club, yet out fans lap it up.
He's easy, take all night to formulate a reply now or pretend he's ignoring me either way he is just a twat
Yes but the Football League requirements are for SISU to provide clear evidence that they have set in motion a credible plan to building a new ground,I'm not sure a 'back of a 'fag packet' drawing will suffice.They will have to convince the football league and more importantly the other clubs that their plans are credible.Where we play next year is immaterial to that requirement.I'm sure the FL will require a substantial up front bond of circa £1 million,to initially reassure the league of their intentions,similar to what Rotherham had to provide.
Why don't you just suck Tim Fishers cock and be done with it? Absolute cretin
Why don't you just suck Tim Fishers cock and be done with it? Absolute cretin
Get an education and I will respond.
Bit of a cheap shot there Grendo.
Agree, whereas as saying 'suck tim fishers cock and be done with it' is the height of maturity.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
I don't believe that particular poster said that.
The highest order would be if the majority of Nuneaton fans did not want it, you like I have no idea what they want
Not saying they did. Just pointing out stuff people say, some of which seems to be ignored.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
The majority won't want it. Nuneaton boro, folded 4-5 years ago and their fans had an opportunity to shift allegiance to ccfc or another local team. They didn't - they set up nuneaton town, started at the bottom and have worked their way up to the conference.
The FL were contemplating not asking for a bond..
However they would be very naive not to
Unfortunately you need an example of where their club maybe in the verge of going under. Then a multimillionaire says tell you what if you move 5 miles down the road. I will secure your future and get you into the championship. Slightly different circumstances.
Haven't we already paid a bond for the golden share? I though all clubs pay a bond, and we'd have paid it on relegation from the PL?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?