Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Some of the house analogies were bad, the shop one was worse, but this one wins the award for the worst yet.
Imagine you have a job. You are skilled and the job is a good fit with you.
However, for some reason the boss doesn't like you. They put unrealistic demands on you and life becomes unpleasant. So much so that you can't carry on working there and resign due to the bosses unreasonable behaviour.
You file a case against the company for constructive dismissal. Isn't this where SISU (you) and ACL/CCC (boss) are AT&T he moment?
Tesco are doing alright with their sales, but they still had the cheek to sell me a big bag of Minstrels for £1.50, they surely don't need the money, they can survive without me, what is their motivation for selling me these?
Because they will have a contract with the manufacturer to retail their product range -- that response by your standards is pretty dumb.
The pro acl posters on here make as little sense as the pro sisu ones. ACL have consistently said they can survive without ccfc. Is Leicester v Man U going to be a big earner? If acl don't need the money what is the motivation for hosting this?
When Tesco have a memorial garden for the ashes of former customers you can then compare ccfc with a supermarket. Until then, the comparison ignores the politics and complexities of the ccfc situation. As I said previously, pro acl posters make as little sense as pro sisu ones. No one seems to be able to offer a good reason for acl hosting this beyond making some money (in which case is this going to be a big money earner? seems doubtful) or else they are desperate for every penny (the pro acl people deny this) - so what is the motive for hosting the game?
When Tesco have a memorial garden for the ashes of former customers you can then compare ccfc with a supermarket. Until then, the comparison ignores the politics and complexities of the ccfc situation. As I said previously, pro acl posters make as little sense as pro sisu ones. No one seems to be able to offer a good reason for acl hosting this beyond making some money (in which case is this going to be a big money earner? seems doubtful) or else they are desperate for every penny (the pro acl people deny this) - so what is the motive for hosting the game?
can anyone give any financial evidence that would disprove that SISU should return to the ricoh on a short term rent deal until legoland is built in nuneaton ?
ACL and the council would talk about this, yet SISU wont
can anyone give any financial evidence that would disprove that SISU should return to the ricoh on a short term rent deal until legoland is built in nuneaton ?
ACL and the council would talk about this, yet SISU wont. In my eyes, thats what makes SISU more "at fault" for CCFC being in Northampton than any other party
The pro acl posters on here make as little sense as the pro sisu ones. ACL have consistently said they can survive without ccfc. Is Leicester v Man U going to be a big earner? If acl don't need the money what is the motivation for hosting this?
What is wrong with football matches being played at the Ricoh. It is what it was built for. SISU don't want our club to play there. It isn't ideal having a under 21 side not from our city playing there but at least it isn't a first team. That would be the time to worry.
can anyone give any financial evidence that would disprove that SISU should return to the ricoh on a short term rent deal until legoland is built in nuneaton ?
ACL and the council would talk about this, yet SISU wont. In my eyes, thats what makes SISU more "at fault" for CCFC being in Northampton than any other party
The real annoyance for me is the subsidised parking - it's OK to charge Coventry supporters £10 but £3 is fine if you are from Leicester.
The minimum lease is 10 years and that was what was proposed.
The real annoyance for me is the subsidised parking - it's OK to charge Coventry supporters £10 but £3 is fine if you are from Leicester.
The minimum lease is 10 years and that was what was proposed.
Isnt that exactly the same as parking in cov town centre on a sat for £1 an hour and yet its 50p all day on a sunday ?
Surely thats just supply and demand ?
really ?. I didnt know that. Is there anywhere that suggests that ? as if there is, surely we could lobby to get this on a year by year basis ?
Football League rules are that the lease if full time has to be a minimum of 10 years
Er....no basic economy of scale means it should be cheaper when fuller, unless like me you agree ACL treat the Coventry public like shit and will rip them off at every opportunity.
Er....no basic economy of scale means it should be cheaper when fuller, unless like me you agree ACL treat the Coventry public like shit and will rip them off at every opportunity.
Football League rules are that the lease if full time has to be a minimum of 10 years
The minimum lease is 10 years and that was what was proposed.
So to park at Wembley, or Old Trafford on match day must be very cheap then ?
Re Leicester U 21 games in Coventry. Why is it ACLs fault, they have a stadium to rent out.
I don't agree with us playing at Sixfields but I don't blame Northampton.t.
I didn't say they gave a fuck about the paying public either so I don't know. I doubt that Old Trafford would offer cheaper parking to Man City if they hosted a game for them, do you?
I doubt that Old Trafford would offer cheaper parking to Man City if they hosted a game for them, do you?
so, this hadnt come from CCC or ACL then, its just part of the FL rules, which they have proven can be "adjusted"
But the FL have been bending the rules for SISU so I can't see it being a problem now. They would be as happy as us to see our club back in Coventry.
I can be pretty confident to say that should Man Utd ever host a Man City Under 21 game at Old Trafford, it would be cheaper to park near the ground than it would be for a Man Utd 1st team game. You dont agree ?
Er....no basic economy of scale means it should be cheaper when fuller, unless like me you agree ACL treat the Coventry public like shit and will rip them off at every opportunity.
I can be pretty confident to say that should Old Trafford ever host a Man City Under 21 game, it would be cheaper to park near the ground than it would be for a Man Utd 1st team game. You dont agree ?
No I don't actually.
So they should charge £3 for concerts when people are prepared to pay £20 and all the car parks at the stadium and around are full?
Don't sound good business to me !
No matter how you package it, it's supply and demand.
Big flaw in that is that it would never happen in the first place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?