Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
So what about webster? Bit of a random one
A bit odd.
Can't see how this is good news. We have just lost a defender in Hines, so just go and swap a defender for another defender, leaving us still short of one defender.
Also weakens our right back position. We now have only Aaron Philips and Jordan Willis for the right back slot and SP has said that he sees Jordan Willis very much as a centre back.
This is not at all a good move unless there is another right back coming in. There was a rumour we had another right back on trial, so maybe we have already made a decision on him. I do sincerely hope so.
Jordan Clarke has had a poor season so far, but we do need to strengthen rather than lose defenders and we simply cannot just have 2 vying for the right back position, with one of them a young player who has only made 17 starts and the other, predominately a centre back.
Let's hope this rumour thing is true and that we have already addressed that imbalance.
I have to agree with this move!
Looks like it might be a popular move
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You may wish to edit or delete this, Rob, cos out of curiosity I jut voted 'no' to see how it affected the poll and it immediately went to 50% yes / 50% no, therefore suggesting that just one person had voted previously.
1 no and 1 yes doesn't exactly make for a) a accurate poll and b) give any vindication it might be popular.
You may wish to edit or delete this, Rob, cos out of curiosity I jut voted 'no' to see how it affected the poll and it immediately went to 50% yes / 50% no, therefore suggesting that just one person had voted previously.
1 no and 1 yes doesn't exactly make for a) a accurate poll and b) give any vindication it might be popular.
Damn it I'd hope you didn't notice!
My attempt was more humour then an attempt to be accurate
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You just wait till somone fires up their 'yes' finger.
CT polls accept multiple voting and it will suddenly jump from 1 saying yes to eleventy billion in favour.
Only some cov fans could disagree with a decision to let one of our worst players go.
Only some cov fans could disagree with a decision to let one of our worst players go.
To be honest I do get what Otis is saying, but Jordan Clarke hasn't been good and Aaron Martin, IMO, is a good centre back who has obviously been a long term target for the Manager.
The RB cover situation is one of those, but I say chuck Dion Kelly-Evans in as cover, Andy will sure be able to confirm this, but Dion Kelly-Evans has impressed in the U18's this season and the U18's squad is doing really well as a team and the players deserve that route to the first team.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You may wish to edit or delete this, Rob, cos out of curiosity I jut voted 'no' to see how it affected the poll and it immediately went to 50% yes / 50% no, therefore suggesting that just one person had voted previously.
1 no and 1 yes doesn't exactly make for a) a accurate poll and b) give any vindication it might be popular.
I wonder if he has a more natural wing back in mind and will be going back to the wing back system when he gets him
Well i just voted yes and it says 100% so don't know where your vote is.
Very good deal imo. Clarke has been shocking whenever I have seen him.
Phillips and Willis are more than enough options at rb.
[h=2]Do you think the Jordan Clarke/Aaron Martin swap deal is a good one for the Sky Blues?[/h]
[h=3]Share the vote[/h]
- YES
50%
- NO
50%
No......Am I the only person who thought Aaron Martin was dodgy?
Clarke never looked that comfortable as a wing back anyway.
Am I the only person who thought Aaron Martin was dodgy?
Clarke never looked that comfortable as a wing back anyway.
Am I the only person who thought Aaron Martin was dodgy?
Do you think the Jordan Clarke/Aaron Martin swap deal is a good one for the Sky Blues?
Share the vote
- YES
50%- NO
50%
CET poll working excellently then.
It's OK though, because this is how they choose which news to delve behind the surface of or not
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?