5-3-2 (1 Viewer)

sneferu

Well-Known Member
Am wondering if we will switch to 5-3-2 particularly away from the CBS. We certainly have the players to play this formation now and we might be more solid.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
I think it could be a weapon for us. Either like you said set up for certain games or we switch to it second half if wingers need to be subbed off and lampard unsure of using brau or bta consistently etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: ptr

mmttww

Well-Known Member
I'm hoping there's more likelihood of using a 442 and being more direct that way. Rudoni could play left or right, Sakamoto the same, and it can easily switch to a 433 with most variations of personnel on the pitch. We tried it a few times in pre-season as well.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Well under Lampard we’ve played the 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, 4-4-2, 3-4-2-1, 5-3-2 and the 5-4-1 so I see it as quite plausible we will move to a three at the back system at some point.

However I don’t see us starting with three at the back unless Grimes or the wingers get injured.

Good to have flexibility mind and would like us to utilise the 5-3-2 in difficult games away from home or difficult sustained pressure where we have the lead (Oxford for example once they went 2-1).
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Called it on Monday in the Norwich thread, but as it's a home game I am feeling less confident in my belief. I think Woolfenden will start and will replace Bobby though and we will play 3 at the back regularly in away matches.

Probably be wrong on all counts, this guessing game is too hard. 🤭
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
I don't see it.

Lampard has only used 5 at the back when his hand has been forced, doubt he wants to play that way normally.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
I really hope we dont see 532 .. we should master the system we play now , not jack it in
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top