Naa. You should ring billionaire Roman Abramovich that loser has only just applied for planning permission to redevelop Stamford Bridge to INCREASE capacity. What a waster, all he has to do is close a few blocks and put prices up. It equals the same according to the Grendull school of economics. I bet he has a light bulb moment when you tell him and it all of a sudden becomes clear why he's been a failure all his life.
If only you were there when Championship club Derby Country last sold their Stadium naming rites for their 33k stadium. Someone must have seen them coming as they only got £7M over 10 years. Mind you they are the same idiots who abandoned their last stadium for a bigger ground when all they had to do was put the prices up. Supply and demand init.
Naming rights, ground sponsorship, parking, corporate sales, events, concerts - seriously either debate like an adult or don't bother.[/QUOTE
But we are not getting a new ground are we? So surely there can be a case that renting the Ricoh with no new stadium financing costs is viable, possibly even advantageous. Has anyone done the sums (without spin)?
Naming rights, ground sponsorship, parking, corporate sales, events, concerts - seriously either debate like an adult or don't bother.[/QUOTE
But we are not getting a new ground are we? So surely there can be a case that renting the Ricoh with no new stadium financing costs is viable, possibly even advantageous. Has anyone done the sums (without spin)?
History shows us that not having access to the additional revenues limited our turnover to one of the lowest in the championship. No new stadium is coming. So we're between a rock and a hard place. A new stadium is viable and staying at the Ricoh limits our potential to in all probability league one - championship yoyo club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
It's ultimately pointless trying to argue with a petulant child like you. You are totally incapable of rational thought and debate. Just a stream of boring, unfunny one liners.
If you want to attempt the condescending approach try and do it properly.
Pot. Kettle.
Naming rights, ground sponsorship, parking, corporate sales, events, concerts - seriously either debate like an adult or don't bother.
History shows us that not having access to the additional revenues limited our turnover to one of the lowest in the championship. No new stadium is coming. So we're between a rock and a hard place. A new stadium is viable and staying at the Ricoh limits our potential to in all probability league one - championship yoyo club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
So does a 15k stadium at the Butts with Gendulls imaginary revenue stream's and unique supply and demand pricing policy that goes against the industry norm of increasing capacity not reducing capacity to gain more revenue.
I'm all for moving to the Butts into a 20k stadium with 25k potential. Anything less than that is nonsense.
It's only you that is droning on about a 15,000 stadium at the Butts.
It's pitiful distraction technique. Gilbert isn't employing you as his bitch is he?
It's only you that is droning on about a 15,000 stadium at the Butts.
It's pitiful distraction technique. Gilbert isn't employing you as his bitch is he?
You wanted a mature debate so I asked you a load of questions in post #42 so we can debate and you ignore them and start posting like a petulant child. What's up? Were the questions to difficult for you? Do you need a grown up to help you?
Tony you are a troll. You can't even identify a single player who plays for the club.
You never log in to match threads of post on anything CCFC related.
You are now really starting to bore me.
Apologies, keep forgetting that all clubs need 365 revenue apart from CCFC. Even your first love Wasps said it was vital.Then hire somewhere else, stop being a victim.
In other words you can't answer the questions because you'll discredit your own "business plan" for the club so you're reverting to posting like a petulant child as a form of distraction.
How much parking revenue will be available at the Butts? We probably get more at the Ricoh on our current deal. Do we not get corporate sales at the Ricoh? Events and concerts? Do you really think we'll be a bigger pull than the Ricoh given that they have a sizable indoor venue and an even larger outdoor venue, a hotel on site, bars on site, restaurants on site, a casino on site and ample parking with good motorway access. Won't we have to apply for some sort of license to put outdoor concerts on? Who would issue/approve that licence? Maybe we can get Marianne Faithful next time she swings by Coventry? I remember you saying what a scoop that was for ACL. The Butts might just have enough room to accommodate her.
We all know that you bring it up every fucking day.Odd how wasps said that wouldn't work and it's vital that they owned a stadium and not rented one.
You would get more revenue as you could sell out the stadium and therefore the ticket prices would be higher.
Demand and supply.
in other words: greed in the DNA and fxxk the fans who can't get in. You are apparently better off than many others, so you would go with that. Keep the riff raff out eh Grendel?
Once again we come back to the same point. The vast majority of clubs don't have the facilities that the Ricoh has. What we need is to be on an equal footing with them. Sure it would be great to have a huge hall and conference rooms etc but how many grounds have?
Absurd and emotional.
I would say realistic and true. This is a football club not Wimbledon lawn tennis club. We need a stadium big enough to allow an average of at least 20000,00 which we should get in the Championship. The Butts is too small and noise restrictions will apply. An example is Bayer Leverkusen where local residents, after years of struggle, have obtained the possibility to stop mid week CL games because of noise levels. I don't need to mention the threats that were flying around should that ever happen. Not nice for all concerned.
Then hire somewhere else, stop being a victim.
So does a 15k stadium at the Butts with Gendulls imaginary revenue stream's and unique supply and demand pricing policy that goes against the industry norm of increasing capacity not reducing capacity to gain more revenue.
I'm all for moving to the Butts into a 20k stadium with 25k potential. Anything less than that is nonsense.
No because we can squeeze them out and then make them rent it off us.And share it with another club (Cov) who have a very long lease. Isn't that rather similar to the current situation?
Not sure we're quite at the stage where we need to worry about the noise from midweek CL games
The campaign was because of the public address system and the away fans driving on to private estates because of ........ Wait for it Dave..... Lack of car parking....
That is an issue at most grounds in the country.
Went to Bradford the other week due to traffic got there late all carparks were full had to risk it on the road, good job we got away with it.
It's not just old grounds. Not much in the way of parking at the Emirates or St Marys for example.
I know just using g that as an example as it was a recent gameIt's not just old grounds. Not much in the way of parking at the Emirates or St Marys for example.
Then hire somewhere else, stop being a victim.
Just pointing out that if we got the Butts, we won't be getting 365 days revenue from car parks or loud events. The Ricoh on a low rent is still the best option for the foreseeable future. Not Perfect, but have heard no better Plan up til now. People accept "365 days Revenue" but never ask what it is or how much Rent we pay to the propco for the 365 days of potential revenue bringers, or even give a date when the Revenue starts to flow. Instead people wonder why the council, in particular, Mutton think that SISU are a bunch of.......
We are a victim.....of council two faced hypocrisy etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?