Yeah. You can’t do half a season with only 3 senior centre backs. Especially when none of them are particularly brilliant.Would people consider the decision to sell Binks was a mistake if we don’t add a centre half?
No it was a good deal and gave us plenty time to sign one. It’s a failure on recruitments part if we dontWould people consider the decision to sell Binks was a mistake if we don’t add a centre half?
So we agree hes late to use his subs? Just some games it works and others it doesn’tWe didn't lose that one either from memory
No because apparently he was on squillions a week, and nobody rated himWould people consider the decision to sell Binks was a mistake if we don’t add a centre half?
He had a bad game. Happens to every young player. He’s better than what we haveGlad we’re walking away from Hughes. Calamity defending from him today for Hull and what we need is experience so we don’t have Kitching and Thomas consistently giving away stupid free kicks. They need an experienced head next to them. Woolf from Ipswich would be a better fit for what we need.
He said in an interview that wer‘e trying to get the right player for the right deal but if we don’t at least wev’e brought the ground, think he’s covering himself but surely we’d of got somebody in by now,it’s not as if we’re not an attractive club, shouldn’t be too hard ?If we sign nobody then I want to be critical of bling, but he has major credit for buying the stadium
Not sure we are tbh, probably just bravado.Glad we’re walking away from Hughes. Calamity defending from him today for Hull and what we need is experience so we don’t have Kitching and Thomas consistently giving away stupid free kicks. They need an experienced head next to them. Woolf from Ipswich would be a better fit for what we need.
I’d be disappointed but also understand why he was sold given we didn’t make a loss on him. Same with Bassette.Would people consider the decision to sell Binks was a mistake if we don’t add a centre half?
No. Getting money for such a poor CH was a master stroke.Would people consider the decision to sell Binks was a mistake if we don’t add a centre half?
Looks like it was never really on. Hull have been transparent on what they value him at and we have failed to pay itA lot of Ipswich fans would happily have Woolf back in the team it seems. Think we just need to tie it up as this Hughes deal looks like its collapsing.
You are an absolute clown, stick to posting random tweets that have fuck all to do with usGlad we’re walking away from Hughes. Calamity defending from him today for Hull and what we need is experience so we don’t have Kitching and Thomas consistently giving away stupid free kicks. They need an experienced head next to them. Woolf from Ipswich would be a better fit for what we need.
Not if we don’t replace himNo. Getting money for such a poor CH was a master stroke.
Tbf often there is a meet in the middle compromise point. I guess there really wasn't for this one. Their owner seems the sort that would dig his heels in.Looks like it was never really on. Hull have been transparent on what they value him at and we have failed to pay it
I think the fact they’re not allowed to buy anyone has worked against usTbf often there is a meet in the middle compromise point. I guess there really wasn't for this one. Their owner seems the sort that would dig his heels in.
It will be king fannying around like he did with kitching, luckily enough Barnsley are shit and were in the league below….its a bit different with hughesLooks like it was never really on. Hull have been transparent on what they value him at and we have failed to pay it
I just hope we haven’t put all of our eggs in one basket thinking Hull would budge on the feeIt will be king fannying around like he did with kitching, luckily enough Barnsley are shit and were in the league below….its a bit different with hughes
Suspected but not confirmed that we did bid for Woolfenden who wasn’t in the Ipswich squad todayWhat happened to bid accepted was that all bollocks? Hughes is the only one we’ve actually heard anything concrete about right?
Think it’s been confirmed we had a bid rejected by Ipswich as well for Woolf and that we put a bid in for Godo.What happened to bid accepted was that all bollocks? Hughes is the only one we’ve actually heard anything concrete about right?
He new it was his last game for Hull, so he wanted to fuck them up and help us in our quest for the top 2.Glad we’re walking away from Hughes. Calamity defending from him today for Hull and what we need is experience so we don’t have Kitching and Thomas consistently giving away stupid free kicks. They need an experienced head next to them. Woolf from Ipswich would be a better fit for what we need.
It’s the only one the reputable journos have posted aboutWhat happened to bid accepted was that all bollocks? Hughes is the only one we’ve actually heard anything concrete about right?
He had a bad game. Happens to every young player. He’s better than what we have
You are an absolute clown, stick to posting random tweets that have fuck all to do with us
Wasn’t it sky sports journo who broke Woolfenden?It’s the only one the reputable journos have posted about
Ah yes I think it wasWasn’t it sky sports journo who broke Woolfenden?
Haven't noticed it so no can't agree. Will keep an eye on it from now on thoughSo we agree hes late to use his subs? Just some games it works and others it doesn’t
I very much doubt we will hear much tonightMight hear something tonight given then window shuts on Monday at 7pm. Not much time left to get things done.
Clearly no bid was accepted if he played today.What happened to bid accepted was that all bollocks? Hughes is the only one we’ve actually heard anything concrete about right?
Agree, some teams will always rotate their full backsWe obviously need that CH badly but the cover down either flank was woeful in the second half. No idea why both full backs weren't substituted when we have KKH &Brau on the bench and why Tats came on so late. Not Lampard's finest afternoon
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?