Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Yep surprised we weren't all over that
Yep surprised we weren't all over thatRichard Kone to QPR for £2.75m + add-ons. Bargain.
Shfwf can’t even get a Wycombe strikerRichard Kone to QPR for £2.75m + add-ons. Bargain.
you can believe that load of nonsense if you wantI can believe though that nobody wants MVE at a price Doug is happy with, which in turn means he’s now willing to accept a piss take offer for Rudoni.
The question wasn't trying to trip you up and be a dick, I'm actually interested in your view.We aren't going to sign Rudoni's replacement for £10m-£30m. Itwill be likely £5m or less.
Comment doesn't even make logical senseI can believe though that nobody wants MVE at a price Doug is happy with, which in turn means he’s now willing to accept a piss take offer for Rudoni.
How does that work?I can believe though that nobody wants MVE at a price Doug is happy with, which in turn means he’s now willing to accept a piss take offer for Rudoni.
Comment doesn't even make logical sense
DK has earmarked £12m for MVE, £15m for RudoniHow does that work?
maybe he's no good?Yep surprised we weren't all over that
Where's that come from? Out of interest?DK has earmarked £12m for MVE, £15m for Rudoni
£15m is obviously far less than what Rudoni should be worth though. And there should definitely be more than £3m difference between the two.DK has earmarked £12m for MVE, £15m for Rudoni
Nobody offers £12m for MVE, therefore we accept £15m for Rudoni for cashflow.
Im just explaining what Brighton is trying to get at.Where's that come from? Out of interest?
Comment doesn't even make logical sense
You bank on one player leaving for a given amount and carry out some spending accordingly. The deal then falls through or happens at a smaller price than planned, so when an unexpected offer comes in for someone else, you’re willing to take a lower fee than you otherwise would for them.How does that work?
DK has earmarked £12m for MVE, £15m for Rudoni
Nobody offers £12m for MVE, therefore we accept £15m for Rudoni for cashflow.
anything £15m or below would be a bit of a pisstakeSo surely he's sticking to his valuations for both? A "piss take" offer would be if it was a panic sale for £5m or something on the last day.
If anything I'd say the opposite. We know the value of our best players and no-one leaves until those valuations are met.You bank on one player leaving for a given amount and carry out some spending accordingly. The deal then falls through or happens at a smaller price than planned, so when an unexpected offer comes in for someone else, you’re willing to take a lower fee than you otherwise would for them.
So surely he's sticking to his valuations for both? A "piss take" offer would be if it was a panic sale for £5m or something on the last day.
We do, but if we had strong reasons to believe MVE was off and had spent money accordingly, if the deal then fell through we’d have a shortfall or at least a cash flow problem.If anything I'd say the opposite. We know the value of our best players and no-one leaves until those valuations are met.
I don't sense that's the case. We were bidding £8mn for a centre half last weekWe do, but if we had strong reasons to believe MVE was off and had spent money accordingly, if the deal then fell through we’d have a shortfall or at least a cash flow problem.
we hardly likely to undervalue Rudoni if we won't sell the right back whose replacement we have brought alreadyWe do, but if we had strong reasons to believe MVE was off and had spent money accordingly, if the deal then fell through we’d have a shortfall or at least a cash flow problem.
Again, perhaps on the assumption that Rudoni is indeed off. And perhaps he was somewhere in the Southampton area when he had a ‘knock’ for the pre season game…I don't sense that's the case. We were bidding £8mn for a centre half last week
I understand what you're suggesting, but I dont think the club is being run that close to the edge.You bank on one player leaving for a given amount and carry out some spending accordingly. The deal then falls through or happens at a smaller price than planned, so when an unexpected offer comes in for someone else, you’re willing to take a lower fee than you otherwise would for them.
given people met him in the lounge during the game that is bollocksAgain, perhaps on the assumption that Rudoni is indeed off. And perhaps he was somewhere in the Southampton area when he had a ‘knock’ for the pre season game…
Again, perhaps on the assumption that Rudoni is indeed off. And perhaps he was somewhere in the Southampton area when he had a ‘knock’ for the pre season game…
he's on a wum or he has reverted back to the bedwetter in chiefhe was at the pre season game? And then he played against hull and last night?
I really don’t get what you are saying
A tongue in cheek comment that second one.he was at the pre season game? And then he played against hull and last night?
I really don’t get what you are saying
it really wasn'tA tongue in cheek comment that second one.
It’s just speculation of course, but most clubs at our level run multi million pound losses each season and borrow to spend what they haven’t got. Ours isn’t much different and if we assume that a sale is going to happen which either doesn’t materialise or is less than planned, it puts pressure on to either borrow, get investment or sell someone else.I understand what you're suggesting, but I dont think the club is being run that close to the edge.
If we didnt have the money to bring in KKH already, I can't see DK spending it. Yes he may well have done that assuming MvE was going, but our financial pattern since he took over makes me struggle to believe he'd put himself in the position to take cut prices on others because his gamble didnt pay off.
MvE might be the perfect example of why buying first isnt always perfect. If MvE plays as many minutes for us this season as last, we'll spend the next 9 months talking about where else that money could have been spent. Same would go for Rudi².
It certainly was.it really wasn't
so far our only outgoings are the loan fee for Rushworth and somewhere around 3.5m for kkh
we could sell mve today and more than cover this
or the owner funds it as he hasIt’s just speculation of course, but most clubs at our level run multi million pound losses each season and borrow to spend what they haven’t got. Ours isn’t much different and if we assume that a sale is going to happen which either doesn’t materialise or is less than planned, it puts pressure on to either borrow, get investment or sell someone else.
just conspiracy theories to slander Doug though isn't itYou bank on one player leaving for a given amount and carry out some spending accordingly. The deal then falls through or happens at a smaller price than planned, so when an unexpected offer comes in for someone else, you’re willing to take a lower fee than you otherwise would for them.
I have no beef with Doug.just conspiracy theories to slander Doug though isn't it
Fair, if he can continue to do so.or the owner funds it as he has
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?