TomRad85
Well-Known Member
Possibly, that still counts in my 6 or 7 though and i won't have it taken from me if correct.
Possibly, that still counts in my 6 or 7 though and i won't have it taken from me if correct.I can see a loan striker and possibly a loan GK instead of permanents in those positions
3 or 4 in but one or maybe two more out.I reckon 3 or 4
To be honest even with our squad as it is now would be enough to get top 6 again, its about adding a couple additions to strengthen the depth, potentially a RB, CM, RW is all we need to have enough but we’d all like more such as a LB, CB and ST which would need outgoings
Considering hes already signed for plymouth probably notDo you think Pato may sign for them next season.
Then you are going to be disappointedPersonally think we'll see 6 or 7.
At this level he would be excellent. Scored 25 in his last season in the Championship
I think we will have at least 5 signings.Then you are going to be disappointed
Well if we had better players we could finish higherMind you some people constantly slag our playerss we could finosh higher saying they aren’t good enough, despite finishing 5the
Bookmark it then talk bro. I won't be disappointed anyway it's just what I think.Then you are going to be disappointed
I know, I am talking about 26/27, he isn't old enough till then.Considering hes already signed for plymouth probably not
I don't want an argument lol, just wondered why people think we will bring that many in when we already have a fairly big squad. If we move people on then yes they'll need replacing but I can't see many leavingJust do, cba to argue about it, Sparks pretty much summed it up. Bookmark and we can discuss after its all over.
Ok fair. I think we'll see a few leave. 4 or 5.I don't want an argument lol, just wondered why people think we will bring that many in when we already have a fairly big squad. I f we move people on then yes they'll need replacing but I can't see many leaving
I don't want an argument lol, just wondered why people think we will bring that many in when we already have a fairly big squad. If we move people on then yes they'll need replacing but I can't see many leaving
Have we been linked?
Lampard link is automaticHave we been linked?
The club doesn't have a big squad, in any case the size is limited by the following restrictions.I don't want an argument lol, just wondered why people think we will bring that many in when we already have a fairly big squad. If we move people on then yes they'll need replacing but I can't see many leaving
Ok fair. I think we'll see a few leave. 4 or 5.
Nobody saying 6/7 is saying that needs to be added onto what we have, we all expect there to be outgoings.It's the net figure between ins and outs that counts. Can't see that being more than an additional 3 or 4 tops. But everybody that goes need replacing, ideally to a higher standard
Definite ins regardless of any departures - keeper, central defence, 1st choice left back and back up right back. Everything else is conditional on outgoings, even Simms and BTA.
We scored lots of goals and gave away lots....
Tbf whenever we signed Bright Enobhakare I fail to count him as a transfer5 summer signings would be the lowest amount for over a decade aside from Sisus last summer when we sold Hyam. And then we signed 4. Before that it was 2013/14 when we were moving to Northampton.
That’s the level you are expecting when we’ve got a new manager?
It was often argued along those lines in 23/24 to try and justify the piss poor first few months of the season.Surely nobody is looking at transfers as a net figure.
Nobody was knocking arounds saying "ackshully we've only made 1 signing net" after completely revamping the squad in League 2
Of course its bloody "net", otherwise the squad would just grow and grow. You need two for every outfield position plus 3 goalies and a couple of extras. The assumption within the 25 or so players is that some are 'squad' onlySurely nobody is looking at transfers as a net figure.
Nobody was knocking arounds saying "ackshully we've only made 1 signing net" after completely revamping the squad in League 2
I think Doyle and Kelly were also free but am open to correctionOf course its bloody "net", otherwise the squad would just grow and grow. You need two for every outfield position plus 3 goalies and a couple of extras. The assumption within the 25 or so players is that some are 'squad' only
And if you hadn't noticed we are challenging for the play offs in the Championship rather than being freshly relegated and reliant on frees like Vincenti, McDonald, O'Brien, Grimmer and Hyam. This time every player will cost serious money one way or another
Yeh not sure what's going on here, feels like people trying to cover their backs so they can be right whatever happens. No one has ever talked about amount of signings as net, that would be fucking weird.Surely nobody is looking at transfers as a net figure.
Nobody was knocking arounds saying "ackshully we've only made 1 signing net" after completely revamping the squad in League 2
The transfer business is net but the signings are just the new additions. To suggest otherwise is silly.Of course its bloody "net", otherwise the squad would just grow and grow. You need two for every outfield position plus 3 goalies and a couple of extras. The assumption within the 25 or so players is that some are 'squad' only
And if you hadn't noticed we are challenging for the play offs in the Championship rather than being freshly relegated and reliant on frees like Vincenti, McDonald, O'Brien, Grimmer and Hyam. This time every player will cost serious money one way or another
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?