Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

25/26 Squad and permutaions (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Tuesday at 8:24 AM
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 8:24 AM
  • #1
Current 24 man squad:

GK Rushworth, Dovin , Wilson

LB JDS, Brau, Bidwell

RB MVE, KKH

CB Thomas, Kitching, Woolf, Lati, Perry

LW EMC

RW Tatsu

CM Grimes, Torp, Rudoni, Eccles, Allen, Andrews

ST Wright, BTA, Simms


Permutations:

GK Rushworth, Dovin , Wilson

LB JDS, Brau, Bidwell, KKH

RB MVE, KKH, Lati, Eccles

CB Thomas, Kitching, Woolf, Lati, Bidwell, Perry

LW EMC, Wright, Tatsu, Brau

RW Tatsu, BTA, KKH, Rudoni

CM Grimes, Torp, Rudoni, Eccles, Allen, Andrews

ST Wright, BTA, Simms, Rudoni


The squad is pretty good. The starting 11 is very strong and we have enough versatility in the squad.
 
Reactions: SAJ, rockwoodfleet, Paul Anthony and 4 others

Domo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 8:44 AM
  • #2
im going to assume that raph wanted to leave to get more minutes but we could have done with keeping him, and have gotten another striker/AF.

will be keen to see how many mins andrews get, thnk he could be a real gem.
 
Reactions: Perennial Lurker
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 8:48 AM
  • #3
I cant understand why we didn’t get a wide player who could play either side. Appreciate we were interested in Godo but we should have had a list of several we could pick up for a reasonable fee and try and develop.

At least Andrews will get minutes and hopefully develop.
 
Reactions: Hincha and Perennial Lurker

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 8:52 AM
  • #4
It’s time for the likes of Andrews to develop quickly with us and the Eccles we saw against Sunderland before he got injured is what he needs to set the benchmark for.

I’ve slept on this but we have a lot of versatile players in our squad which is a positive.
 
Reactions: wingy, Sky Blue Pete and covcity4life
J

jto123

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 8:54 AM
  • #5
All depends on ambitions, but I don’t believe the CM drop off speaks to a promotion winning squad.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:01 AM
  • #6
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Current 24 man squad:

GK Rushworth, Dovin , Wilson

LB JDS, Brau, Bidwell

RB MVE, KKH

CB Thomas, Kitching, Woolf, Lati, Perry

LW EMC

RW Tatsu

CM Grimes, Torp, Rudoni, Eccles, Allen, Andrews

ST Wright, BTA, Simms


Permutations:

GK Rushworth, Dovin , Wilson

LB JDS, Brau, Bidwell, KKH

RB MVE, KKH, Lati, Eccles

CB Thomas, Kitching, Woolf, Lati, Bidwell, Perry

LW EMC, Wright, Tatsu, Brau

RW Tatsu, BTA, KKH, Rudoni

CM Grimes, Torp, Rudoni, Eccles, Allen, Andrews

ST Wright, BTA, Simms, Rudoni


The squad is pretty good. The starting 11 is very strong and we have enough versatility in the squad.
Click to expand...

There is lots of flexibility in the squad. Okay not perfect replacements but you will never get that. Some players put in certain positions will offer something different.

In an ideal world I would have liked someone who could play on both wings and at 10. Godo might have ticked that box and it seems we had interest. He went for a reported 7m in the end. Whether that put us off or maybe he preferred a move abroad who knows? But he does get the chance of some European Conference League football.
 
Reactions: Perennial Lurker and AFCCOVENTRY
H

HJones23

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:01 AM
  • #7
I said it on the transfer thread but I don't think it will be long until we see us go to a 5 atb and whilst I personally do not like it, it's proven to be effective. I think the business we have done has strengthened our arm for this adding a good 3rd CB, an attacking FB to rotate with Milan (who I think struggles playing RWB) & Brau looking like he would be better suited to LWB for the time being. The only counter to this I think was that Sheaf would be well suited to play in this formation.

Based on the first few games I think any formation that has Rudi, Torp & Haj playing the way they are is going to cause problems.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:05 AM
  • #8
Hobo said:
There is lots of flexibility in the squad. Okay not perfect replacements but you will never get that. Some players put in certain positions will offer something different.

In an ideal world I would have liked someone who could play on both wings and at 10. Godo might have ticked that box and it seems we had interest. He went for a reported 7m in the end. Whether that put us off or maybe he preferred a move abroad who knows? But he does get the chance of some European Conference League football.
Click to expand...

Also the problem we have is we can’t sign expensive players to sit on the bench either and loan players where their clubs are saying they are guaranteed playing time. So it’s a fine balance.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueCharlie9, slondonskyblue and Hobo

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:07 AM
  • #9
HJones23 said:
I said it on the transfer thread but I don't think it will be long until we see us go to a 5 atb and whilst I personally do not like it, it's proven to be effective. I think the business we have done has strengthened our arm for this adding a good 3rd CB, an attacking FB to rotate with Milan (who I think struggles playing RWB) & Brau looking like he would be better suited to LWB for the time being. The only counter to this I think was that Sheaf would be well suited to play in this formation.

Based on the first few games I think any formation that has Rudi, Torp & Haj playing the way they are is going to cause problems.
Click to expand...

Yes indeed. If we have an injury crisis to our wingers then you eliminate that with wingbacks and 3 at the back.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:09 AM
  • #10
Defence seems fine now but we really do lack depth in midfield and upfront. i guess you could have Rudoni play in Totp’s role if needed, but the revisionism around the forward players like BTA and Simms after the common consensus they should be moved on is pretty crazy.

BTA is basically our “cover” in every position which isn’t great.

It’s desperate but i’d genuinely consider getting in Emmanuel Dennis and Iannis Hagi

Brau, KKH and MVE are not wingers.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:10 AM
  • #11
Ccfcisparks said:
It’s desperate but i’d genuinely consider getting in Emmanuel Dennis and Iannis Hagi
Click to expand...
I would too honestly.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:11 AM
  • #12
TomRad85 said:
I would too honestly.
Click to expand...
dennis offers us flexibility and can play on the wing or upfront.

Hagi allows Rudoni to drop down into the 8 whilst also being able to play on the wings.

Wingers are the 1 position you do not get 90 minutes out of players
 
Reactions: TomRad85

lord_garrincha

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 9:27 AM
  • #13
Rafa only got extended league game time once we were 7 nil up.

If we kept him, he still would not have played him.

The loan is good for him & will give us an insight whether he's worth keeping.

It can go one of two ways...

McSheffrey at Luton; or
Hilsner at Oldham.
 
Reactions: SAJ, Briles, oakey and 1 other person

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:32 AM
  • #14
Ccfcisparks said:
Defence seems fine now but we really do lack depth in midfield and upfront. i guess you could have Rudoni play in Totp’s role if needed, but the revisionism around the forward players like BTA and Simms after the common consensus they should be moved on is pretty crazy.

BTA is basically our “cover” in every position which isn’t great.

It’s desperate but i’d genuinely consider getting in Emmanuel Dennis and Iannis Hagi

Brau, KKH and MVE are not wingers.
Click to expand...

Brau, KKH and MVE are not wingers but can play in a wide midfield role. Dasilva has been a winger. I don't think Mason-Clarke is an out an out winger. More a wide attacking forward. Sakamoto is the only traditional winger we have.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:32 AM
  • #15
Hobo said:
Brau, KKH and MVE are not wingers but can play in a wide midfield role. Dasilva has been a winger. I don't think Mason-Clarke is an out an out winger. More a wide attacking forward. Sakamoto is the only traditional winger we have.
Click to expand...
They can't play in a 433 formation though. When has JDS been a winger in a 433?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:33 AM
  • #16
Ccfcisparks said:
They can't play in a 433 formation though. When has JDS been a winger in a 433?
Click to expand...

Started his career there.
 
Reactions: covcity4life

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:34 AM
  • #17
Hobo said:
Started his career there.
Click to expand...
For which club? I cannot find anything on it
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:37 AM
  • #18
Ccfcisparks said:
For which club? I cannot find anything on it
Click to expand...

When he was at Chelsea but got converted to a wing back/ full back. I think some of his England youth caps may have been on the wing.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:38 AM
  • #19
Hobo said:
When he was at Chelsea but got converted to a wing back/ full back. I think some of his England youth caps may have been on the wing.
Click to expand...
OK, I thought you were talking about professional games. To me, a position a player played at youth and kids level doesn't suggest to me he's a viable option to play there.
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:39 AM
  • #20
Hobo said:
Brau, KKH and MVE are not wingers but can play in a wide midfield role. Dasilva has been a winger. I don't think Mason-Clarke is an out an out winger. More a wide attacking forward. Sakamoto is the only traditional winger we have.
Click to expand...
Got to assume Brau and KKH were recruited on the basis they are fairly adaptable and can play in most wide positions?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:43 AM
  • #21
Ccfcisparks said:
OK, I thought you were talking about professional games. To me, a position a player played at youth and kids level doesn't suggest to me he's a viable option to play there.
Click to expand...

He has knowledge of the position though. It is why he looks more comfortable attacking than he does defending, but that is just my opinion.

Any player playing in a secondary role won't be as good as someone in there main role. But football often requires that flexibility. Sometimes you have to tweek the tactics to suit. It does not matter if you have two wingers available for one spot, they won't be identical.
 
Reactions: oakey

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:44 AM
  • #22
Hobo said:
He has knowledge of the position though. It is why he looks more comfortable attacking than he does defending, but that is just my opinion.

Any player playing in a secondary role won't be as good as someone in there main role. But football often requires that flexibility. Sometimes you have to tweek the tactics to suit. It does not matter if you have two wingers available for one spot, they won't be identical.
Click to expand...
Perhaps. To me if JDS is ever turning out on the wing for us it signals a failure in squad planning.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:47 AM
  • #23
Ccfcisparks said:
Perhaps. To me if JDS is ever turning out on the wing for us it signals a failure in squad planning.
Click to expand...

I could argue having him at full back is a failure in squad planning.
 
Reactions: skybluecam

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 10:48 AM
  • #24
Hobo said:
I could argue having him at full back is a failure in squad planning.
Click to expand...
I totally agree.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:12 AM
  • #25
Alot of these players mentioned might not be wingers but they can play there

It's not ideal but we have no idea how many times they will need to be called pon and how they might do either yet
 

curly_tom

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:33 AM
  • #26
The problem is, as mentioned, that it's hard to have the cover players who are as good as the first 11, they would want to play. Every squad has some kind of drop off I think. We have very experienced players below the first 11, BTA, Eccles, Lati, Bidwell, Allen etc. They are all going to play this year and have all played a lot at this level. I feel ok about it. I think this squad is good enough for play-offs again and might push for autos (although unlikely I think).
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:40 AM
  • #27
Ccfcisparks said:
Perhaps. To me if JDS is ever turning out on the wing for us it signals a failure in squad planning.
Click to expand...
To be fair for a stop gap, it could work. Seems to have the attributes and defensively would help our fullback out.

Still think, Dasilva is an out and out WB. Definitely doesn’t help the argument on squad planning tho
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:41 AM
  • #28
Sky Blue Goblin said:
To be fair for a stop gap, it could work. Seems to have the attributes and defensively would help our fullback out.

Still think, Dasilva is an out and out WB. Definitely doesn’t help the argument on squad planning tho
Click to expand...
It absolutely could not work playing Jay Da Silva as a LW in a 433. He does not have the attributes at all.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:47 AM
  • #29
Ccfcisparks said:
It absolutely could not work playing Jay Da Silva as a LW in a 433. He does not have the attributes at all.
Click to expand...
You don’t think, personally rate him more in attack than defence. Again wouldn’t want him playing week in week out.

But he’s got good dribbling and accurate in his passing. Dasilva and EMC below. Obvious difference is the shooting




 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:48 AM
  • #30
Sky Blue Goblin said:
You don’t think, personally rate him more in attack than defence. Again wouldn’t want him playing week in week out.

But he’s got good dribbling and accurate in his passing. Dasilva and EMC below. Obvious difference is the shooting


View attachment 45772

View attachment 45773
Click to expand...
He has no pace, can't beat a man and no strength. He would be a disaster as a LW
 

CCFCBat

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:49 AM
  • #31
Ccfcisparks said:
It absolutely could not work playing Jay Da Silva as a LW in a 433. He does not have the attributes at all.
Click to expand...
FL doesn't think so because he prefers Brau at LW
 
Reactions: Ccfcisparks

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:49 AM
  • #32
Ccfcisparks said:
He has no pace, can't beat a man and no strength. He would be a disaster as a LW
Click to expand...
Maybe but there is a beggars and chooses argument here sadly since the club decided to go out for a wing wah last night
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:49 AM
  • #33
Sky Blue Goblin said:
Maybe but there is a beggars and chooses argument here sadly since the club decided to go out for a wing wah last night
Click to expand...
As mentioned above Lampard clearly prefers Brau as back up LW
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:56 AM
  • #34
Ccfcisparks said:
dennis offers us flexibility and can play on the wing or upfront.

Hagi allows Rudoni to drop down into the 8 whilst also being able to play on the wings.

Wingers are the 1 position you do not get 90 minutes out of players
Click to expand...
Save your emotional energy we’ve never signed free transfers and we won’t this season either
 
Reactions: rockwoodfleet and shmmeee

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Tuesday at 11:56 AM
  • #35
Sky Blue Pete said:
Save your emotional energy we’ve never signed free transfers and we won’t this season either
Click to expand...
Jamie Paterson? Sean Maguire?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?