I have noticed the likes of Rfc and Grendel using this card lately.
Currently the only reason that this would be a break even figure is to keep up with Sisu's legal costs !!!!
At the time though the wage bill was massive to what it is now !!!!!
Those figures are based on the original rent figure, £1:28 million!
If it takes 22k fans to pay a £1.2m a year rent, then that means each ticket sold generated £2.37!
Using that same ratio then, the clubs current ticket income for the year will be £109k!
What Bullshit!
also break even is based on wages between 7.1m in 2005 7.1 in 2006 and 9.8m in 2007.
Turnovers were 8.7m in 2005 9.9m in 2006 and 9.7m in 2007
In my mind the problems were yes the rent being too high but the bigger factor was paying out too much in wages.
It is in a sense ironic that having very little in turnover and a small wage bill (what 2m?) that people are claiming we are playing the best football in years ....... kind of begs the question what was the real problem in previous years doesnt it?
Those figures are based on the original rent figure, £1:28 million!
If the rent at the ricoh had been the same as the rent at sixfields (which is a ludicrous suggestion given their differences) it would have still taken 19k fans to break even using those figures.
The rent was too high but it was still a small percentage of the costs and certainly not the main problem.
In my mind the problems were yes the rent being too high but the bigger factor was paying out too much in wages.
Think we are singing from the same page though arent we
And a wage bill of?
I have noticed the likes of Rfc and Grendel using this card lately.
Currently the only reason that this would be a break even figure is to keep up with Sisu's legal costs !!!!
At the time though the wage bill was massive to what it is now !!!!!
If it takes 22k fans to pay a £1.2m a year rent, then that means each ticket sold generated £2.37!
Using that same ratio then, the clubs current ticket income for the year will be £109k!
What Bullshit!
also break even was based on wages between 7.1m in 2005 7.1 in 2006 and 9.8m in 2007.
Turnovers were 8.7m in 2005 9.9m in 2006 and 9.7m in 2007
In my mind the problems were yes the rent being too high but the bigger factor was paying out too much in wages.
It is in a sense ironic that having very little in turnover and a small wage bill (what 2m?) that people are claiming we are playing the best football in years ....... kind of begs the question what was the real problem in previous years doesnt it?
The break-even figure includes all costs staff & player wages as well as rent etc. etc. etc
With my beloved club playing the way we are at the minute, with a manager rebuilding from the bottom, i couldnt care less about any of this shit anymore. Im Behind my team PUSB
Not enough to secure a top 6 finish or do you advocate player sales and squad reduction?
It'd be no surprise to see Baker and co on £8k a week...
any sane business wouldnt spend more on wages than they had coming in though NW.
Baker and Murphy are AFAIK the only players not signed under the current board. Knowing Delieu you're probably not far off.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?