what are you defending, the fact you have information, or the non stop gossip, and the total lack of any filter between hearing said information & spewing it all over here?
Because of your second paragraph.why are people getting worked up about people sharing information - if you don’t like it or want to believe it, fine scroll on or don’t engage.
Others may find it interesting and useful as an incite to what’s going on - of course there’s always a balance to be struck with the narrative and message shared, that’s down to you to figure out.
Don’t see why people are getting on at members like @Saddlebrains et al.
Because of your second paragraph.
He doesn't share information, he shares a narrative which is either consciously or unconsciously negatively biased.
It’s one side’s perspective. We don’t hear the other and the truth will be somewhere between.Sorry but ITKs are not reporters. They are of course bias based on the information provided. Saddle has bias based on what he’s heard (or his source does). Why does that mean the information is not real. Take it with a pinch of salt or don’t read it.
And Saddle, get back out there and get me my pictures of make robins sacking Chris Ramsey’s hand.
When you start giving facts i’ll start paying attentionIt is information though isn't it
You're view on it is it's biased. Either way it is information.
Here's the dictionary definition to help you
1.
facts provided or learned about something or someone.
"a vital piece of information"
2.
what is conveyed or represented by a particular arrangement or sequence of things.
"genetically transmitted information
1. Was reported in the swedish gossip columns linking us directly?
2. “Doug refuses” This cant be proven, all that can be proven is we dont currently have any loans in the team, but others on here have posted that we were looking at at least twoz. That cant be proven either obv.
3. Old Source
4. Who cares? Leaking a team teamsheet is very different to all the other things you claim to be in the loop on.
5. Old Source
6. Old Source
7. Others on here were there on kits first
Id argue you’re very rarely definitively shown to be correct.
"correlation does not imply causation"
Mary loves dick is still one of my favourite TV moments.he is the Derek Acorah of SBT
Compared to what GIMOC comes out with its a ray of sunshine. I think GIMOCs info, especially last summer, was purposely negative and complete hogwash. (Seems to have reined it in a bit recently tbf.)Because of your second paragraph.
He doesn't share information, he shares a narrative which is either consciously or unconsciously negatively biased.
Compared to what GIMOC comes out with its a ray of sunshine. I think GIMOCs info, especially last summer, was purposely negative and complete hogwash. (Seems to have reined it in a bit recently tbf.)
Saddles stuff I think its fairly easy to tell what is likely to be accurate and what to take with a pinch of salt. Team news stuff I get why some might not like it, personally I doubt opposition staff read through this shite. I like getting it so I just ask via DM.
Ultimately this is just a place for fans to spew all things ccfc, be you a dubious itk, a waffler, a bed wetter, a Robins outer or Doug King undercover. Probably best not to take it too seriously.
And that’s ultimately a problem when people take one side as ultimately truthful. In life there’s three truths, your side, there side and the truth.It’s one side’s perspective. We don’t hear the other and the truth will be somewhere between.
Transfers are a real hard point to stick someone with only as it changes within hours.Doug wont sanction loans
Except the multiple times ive posted my source has said we’re looking at loans.
This is the bullshit i have a problem with, like i said, the facts are we dont have any loans, the claim this has anything to do with Doug either exposes the source as waffle or that Saddle likes to baseless assumptions to it
You've answered your own question there I think. The negative rumours far outweigh the positive so clearly those leaking have their own agenda. Problem is a lot of people will ignore the times the various ITKs have been wrong and take everything as 100% true. Year after year we've been told there's trouble behind the scenes, the players don't get on, the new players who have come in have been disruptive etc, who does that help?why are people getting worked up about people sharing information - if you don’t like it or want to believe it, fine scroll on or don’t engage.
Others may find it interesting and useful as an incite to what’s going on - of course there’s always a balance to be struck with the narrative and message shared, that’s down to you to figure out.
Regardless of the bollux around Av's exit do we think we're in a better place, seriously, where is the turnaround?You've answered your own question there I think. The negative rumours far outweigh the positive so clearly those leaking have their own agenda. Problem is a lot of people will ignore the times the various ITKs have been wrong and take everything as 100% true. Year after year we've been told there's trouble behind the scenes, the players don't get on, the new players who have come in have been disruptive etc, who does that help?
For me its incredibly unprofessional, if I was leaking information from my completely unimportant job nobody gives a shit about I'd be in trouble, its not a good reflection on the club that this has been going on for years.
Personally I don't think the team should be announced on here well ahead of the match. In a game of small margins why would you risk giving away an advantage no matter how small that risk is.
Then there's the things about people personal lives. I don't for a second believe the things that have been revealed about the likes of Robins and McFadz weren't known by local media so they've clearly been asked not to make it public yet its on here. That's before you get to the absolute bollocks we've had about 'players wife / gf hates Cov and is desperate to leave'.
A lot of the other stuff is subjective but quickly starts getting posted by others as a cast iron fact. I think what winds people up is it's always overwhelming negative.
ITKI understand this is complete bollocks
A quick Google brings up he’s involved in an employment tribunal about a former player at QPR, to be heard next yearSo what's happening with this appointment?
Is it dead, are we still recruiting for the position?
Fair enough.Not happening now apparently. Not prepared to go into details but it wasn’t approved to move forward at this time.
If this is true don't expect to see Robins around much longer
I've just been told he doesn't want this
It seems Robins may have reached out initially, so was onboard. However it didn’t get any further.
From what I can make out, Robins may have reached out based on a recommendation from within (the latter part not confirmed but CR is known by at least two people already at the club).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?