We owe them for the home defeat when half the team had the shits but it's looking tough. Unbeaten at home in their last 6 (W2 D4) and will obviously be on a high after last night. Sheaf in for Maguire, Walker in for Godden.
Wilson
McNally Fadz Doyle
Burroughs Hamer Sheaf Eccles Bidwell
Walker Vik
Still reckon we could and should be winning but head is saying another draw, entertaining 2-2. Despite how deflating it would feel, going 9 unbeaten would still be an achievement.
Walker, Sheaf and Dabo in.
Godden, Maguire and Burroughs out.
Agree with thatGive Maguire another go, but play him in behind Vik.
Dabo in at wing back, other than that, same side that finished providing Sheaf is fit enough.
I would agree with this other than Dabo. If he needs resting after two appearances of around an hour, then I don't see the point in playing someone that is probably going to break down. Looking at the run through of yesterday though, Godden and Maguire missed good chances. The former looked like a Sunday League player and no matter how much I like him, I think he has to be dropped.
That's the spiritWe’ll be all over them probably have 20 shots with no goal, 15 shit corners and then concede from Blackpools 1st effort.
1-0 Blackpool
Who is walker-brace?2-0 Walker brace
It was like an attack v defence training session, just without the defenceAll their QPR goals were from set pieces so beware
Thing is, that matters very little, as Blackpool are fighting for their survival and they’ve just spanked QPR 6-1. They have a loud following, who are like the 12th man at the minute, and they probably won’t be a push over: and this kind of complacency from our fans is what usually ends in an interwebz fight when we underperform against a side that’s up for it.We have nothing to be afraid of they aren't bottom 3 for nothing and we owe them for there shocking win at the CBS .Also remember where we are compared to October
Thing is, that matters very little, as Blackpool are fighting for their survival and they’ve just spanked QPR 6-1. They have a loud following, who are like the 12th man at the minute, and they probably won’t be a push over: and this kind of complacency from our fans is what usually ends in an interwebz fight when we underperform against a side that’s up for it.
If we can get back to the kind of watertight defensive mindset we had, and replace Godden with Walker (the former is just wasting too many goal scoring opportunities) and maybe give Maguire another go to link up with Vik and Walker, who knows.
Exactly my team selection. Part tempted to push another into midfield to let Hamer take a more advanced role, with Vik up front on his own.No way would I play Maguire in midfield again - we got overrun in the first half in midfield. I'd go with the team that finished the game minus Walker for Godden and Dabo for BNC.
Makes sense, as I’ve only seen highlights Vs Wigan and gauged how he played via the (contrasting) opinions on here.No way would I play Maguire in midfield again - we got overrun in the first half in midfield. I'd go with the team that finished the game minus Walker for Godden and Dabo for BNC.
That’s always a temptation, considering how good Gus is getting forward, creating, moving, finding that killer pass, and his finishing is amongst the best in the team.Exactly my team selection. Part tempted to push another into midfield to let Hamer take a more advanced role, with Vik up front on his own.
Gus isn't a 10, that midfield could work in a 6 and 2 8's system thoughThat’s always a temptation, considering how good Gus is getting forward, creating, moving, finding that killer pass, and his finishing is amongst the best in the team.
Would Sheaf and Eccles work as DMF’s with Hamer in the ‘O’Hare’ role?
Has MR ever tried that, anyone?
That’s always a temptation, considering how good Gus is getting forward, creating, moving, finding that killer pass, and his finishing is amongst the best in the team.
Would Sheaf and Eccles work as DMF’s with Hamer in the ‘O’Hare’ role?
Has MR ever tried that, anyone?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?