Player wages, management wages, coaching staff wages, ancillary staff wages, policing costs, rent until last year(!), travel costs, agents fees, Ranson was on £300K a year (though still not as much as Richardson paid himself), small crowds, refurbished Ryton. The list goes on...
I would love to see some people on here spending their money keeping CCFC going.
Player wages, management wages, coaching staff wages, ancillary staff wages, policing costs, rent until last year(!), travel costs, agents fees, Ranson was on £300K a year (though still not as much as Richardson paid himself), small crowds, refurbished Ryton. The list goes on...
I would love to see some people on here spending their money keeping CCFC going.
But if they have written off a serious starting debt then surely this is what they always refer to. The question is have we paid off the debt as to write somethiing off surely they have to pay ot off?
Do all other clubs not have those outgoings though?
It's not that inconceivable, forest had been losing £1m per month for 2 years
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...that-the-future-is-the-derby-way-6329938.html
Your question was how have SISU spent £45M. Not what outgoings other clubs have. I'm suggesting ways that £45M could have been spent in the last 5 years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm sure they do. I'm sure those clubs don't have the millstone of the Ricoh Arena around their necks though.
<p>
My point was that any business people that can lose £45m and make a company worse is surely incompetent.
Don't think anyone would deny that Sisus time as owners has been nothing short of disastrous but there is no one else willing to take the club on.We repeatedly hear that sisu have put in £45m, and that we should be grateful for that.
In any other business, if the owner invested £45m and actually made the company substantially worse, would you not think they were incompetent?
You suggested SISU had not spent that amount. I just offering suggestions on how they probably have.
Don't think anyone would deny that Sisus time as owners has been nothing short of disastrous but there is no one else willing to take the club on.
Yep I noticed that. Hoffman??Tim says he's written off the debt so their should be a queue of people wanting to take it on now.
All this conspiracy about sisu hiding money is nonsense.
The club when they took it over was losing well in excess of £6 million a year and needed 22,000 paying adults to break even. Paul fletcher said the council would eventually destroy the club and he was right.
There was also a little matter of creditors including the revenue to pay off.
Not what I was suggesting. I have no doubt they have spent that much on the club. That is why they are so incompetent.
Odd. That's the first time I've heard a fan calling a board incompetent because they have SPENT money. Good job they did. We'd have no Club.
So as long as they continue to waste the clubs money they are free from criticism?
Player wages, management wages, coaching staff wages, ancillary staff wages, policing costs, rent until last year(!), travel costs, agents fees, Ranson was on £300K a year (though still not as much as Richardson paid himself), small crowds, refurbished Ryton. The list goes on...
I would love to see some people on here spending their money keeping CCFC going.
Exactly, some people just don't get it, it's a football club, not a stall on Coventry market. The costs of keeping it running are enormous.
Odd. That's the first time I've heard a fan calling a board incompetent because they have SPENT money. Good job they did. We'd have no Club.
So as long as they continue to waste the clubs money they are free from criticism?
Unbelievable thread. One minute Sisu 'haven't spent any money' now it's 'they have but it shows they are incompetent'.
Most football clubs lose money.
Interesting angle on this thread though. Odd, but interesting.
So as long as they continue to waste the clubs money they are free from criticism?
You are an idiot. The clubs money gets spent. Very very quickly. Then there's more bills to pay, SISUs money pays that.
The biggest expense is our squad, are you saying they shouldn't back their managers like they have? I'd be inclined to agree but I think everyone knows this is an exceptional season outside of FFP and our best chance to bounce back up. Besides, when they forced the manager to cut his cloth, most on here were up in arms and claimed it caused us to be relegated. Can't have your cake and eat it.
Tl;dr: Sisu cut clubs out goings = incompetent. Sisu back the manager = incompetent. SBT logic.
I'm an idiot for having a different opinion than you?
no, an idiot for having an idiotic opinion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?