Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

£170,000 Ave Div 1 Rent? (5 Viewers)

  • Thread starter ashbyjan
  • Start date Dec 13, 2012
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #36
Grendel said:
Let SISU buy the mortgage then -- I am sure ACL will love that.
Click to expand...

ACL had a chat with them about buying their share of the stadium they agreed a price then heard no more from SISU
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #37
dongonzalos said:
ACL had a chat with them about buying their share of the stadium they agreed a price then heard no more from SISU
Click to expand...

That's not the mortgage -- they could buy the loan from Yorkshire Bank.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #38
dongonzalos said:
How much is the mortgage?
Click to expand...

15.6 million c.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #39
Grendel said:
Don't know. Keepmoat does though. Doncaster seem to have been paying a notional rent for years and the place is losing money. Doncaster have been offered a deal to pay a formal rent and then make profit from the ground if they agree to manage the place.
Click to expand...

Who owns Doncaster how have the club been managed for the last 5 years?
Have the owners upset the fans, council players managers and pretty much everyman and their dog.

Or do people know who actually own Doncaster and are people comfortable with the owners
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #40
Grendel said:
That's not the mortgage -- they could buy the loan from Yorkshire Bank.
Click to expand...

Doesn't sound like they are offering to buy much.

Taylor says the mortgage is 15 million.

Do SISU now have 15 million
 
Last edited: Dec 14, 2012

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #41
dongonzalos said:
Who owns Doncaster how have the club been managed for the last 5 years?
Have the owners upset the fans, council players managers and pretty much everyman and their dog.

Or do people know who actually own Doncaster and are people comfortable with the owners
Click to expand...

Have Donny had crippling rent to pay? It's a cycle, if we didn't have such high rent, we may have been able to spend more in transfer market.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #42
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
No, but do ACL need. 1.28m a year? No! Are CCFC paying for a product that is over the market value?
Click to expand...

By the sounds of it. Otherwise ACL would not have compromised. However are SISU maximising the use of the facility they are renting.
If a company rent some office space and agree to pay 1200 a month for a year. They then run their business very badly and are not working at 60 percent capacity. They then refuse to pay for the office space unless you let them have it for 200 a month. You compromise and say 400
I can see why ACL are pissed off.
What was our average attendance in SISU's first year.
What would have been our average attendance if we had s successful spell in the championship.
What would be our average attendance in the premiership.
What is our average attendance now after years of bad decisions by SISU.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #43
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Have Donny had crippling rent to pay? It's a cycle, if we didn't have such high rent, we may have been able to spend more in transfer market.
Click to expand...

Who bank rolls SISU. Who are you compromising and negotiating with....
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #44
dongonzalos said:
If a company rent some office space and agree to pay 1200 a month for a year. They then run their business very badly and are not working at 60 percent capacity. They then refuse to pay for the office space unless you let them have it for 200 a month. You compromise and say 400
I can see why ACL are pissed off.
Click to expand...

This is a fundamentally flawed analogy, why? Tenants feel price is unfair, they leave and go elsewhere and landlord can find someone willing to pay. Here, landlords have no other realistic alternative to CCFC whereas CCFC can leave*,but it's not ideal, bottom line is, it is other like the analogy you have given.

*I'm sure we could share with Brum or incester on a temporary basis, I'm unclear on FL rules here.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #45
10k fans attend the Ricoh how many are you expecting at brum or incester.

I would hazzard a guess at 2k.

How much would we have to pay those clubs to share.

We are still then contractually obligated to the Ricoh.

As would the unhappy tenant in my analogy. They would be obligated for the length of the contract so are free to move but still have to pay their debt.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #46
For people to be discussing a groundshare even semi seriously is nonsensical. Stop encouraging Fisher to keep peddling it!
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #47
Brighton Sky Blue said:
For people to be discussing a groundshare even semi seriously is nonsensical. Stop encouraging Fisher to keep peddling it!
Click to expand...

Agree a load of tosh. That needs squashing when someone regurgitates his rubbish
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #48
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Have Donny had crippling rent to pay? It's a cycle, if we didn't have such high rent, we may have been able to spend more in transfer market.
Click to expand...

Then we could have negotiated it in 2007 rather than now.
 
C

crowsnest

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #49
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Then we could have negotiated it in 2007 rather than now.
Click to expand...

The club signed a 40 year deal when ACL was part owned by CCFC. Do you really think ACL would have renegotiated a deal that was only a few years old?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #50
crowsnest said:
The club signed a 40 year deal when ACL was part owned by CCFC. Do you really think ACL would have renegotiated a deal that was only a few years old?
Click to expand...

It's still less than 10 years old now.
 
M

Moscowskyblue

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #51
Grendel said:
We pay 1000% more. It's the equivalent of paying for Windsor castle but living in Bell Green.

It's beyond any justification.
Click to expand...

Totally irrelevant comparison, whatever the deal it was agreed to by sisu and although sisu are entitled to ask for a reduction, they have no right to withhold payments. More like we are living above our means and need a debt management company to negotiate on our behalf. This posturing may yield results but at what long term costs to ACL and CCFC?
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #52
We could do with having fees broken down, what does the rent cover ?
For example lighting and how much, same with heating. What about police fees are these included ?
Anyone know ?
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #53
170k divided by 25 home games comes out at 6.8k a game.
I would think it would be impossible for ACL to break even for that sought of money !!!!!
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #54
sky blue john said:
We could do with having fees broken down, what does the rent cover ?
For example lighting and how much, same with heating. What about police fees are these included ?
Anyone know ?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure weather the 1.2 million rent covered these fees, I don't think anyone has ever clarified it. It has been said that whilst the club have withheld rent they have continued paying running costs for the match day which would include the things above, this has been quoted as costing 10k per match. If the deal offered by ACL is 400k + running cost of approx. 250k per year then that is still too much imo. If the 400k offer included these costs, I would say it is a pretty good deal
It is all unclear and leaves the fans doing guesswork and making assumptions about the offers reported in the papers
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #55
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Then we could have negotiated it in 2007 rather than now.
Click to expand...

Agreed, but, the plan was to get promoted ASAP, then rent wouldn't have been a problem, agreed?

Further more, I wasn't encouraging TF to move from the RICOH, just they are better choices than Nuneaton or Hinckley.

Dongazalos... Seriously, 2k!?!? At least 6k.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #56
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Agreed, but, the plan was to get promoted ASAP, then rent wouldn't have been a problem, agreed?

Further more, I wasn't encouraging TF to move from the RICOH, just they are better choices than Nuneaton or Hinckley.

Dongazalos... Seriously, 2k!?!? At least 6k.
Click to expand...

I actually thought that was around what we'd get for this season at the Ricoh 7-8k. max.We often lambast the no-shows but maybe we should appluad the ones who stick with it.:claping hands:
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #57
AFAIK any of the rent figures banded about by ACL or the club are excluding match day costs. It's all pure profit (just going on second hand info though, would be nice to see a direct source).

The argument about not negotiating earlier is silly. Not having done something earlier isn't a reason to not do it now.

Also, we started withholding rent as a negotiating tactic, frankly I'm amazed its taken this long before ACL forced SISUs hand. It seems to show Sisu are a lot better at brinksmanship than ACL which ultimately I'm glad about as I want the best deal for CCFC.

EDIT: just thought that it can't include matchday costs as otherwise the money the club has been paying since the negotiations began would be taken off the debt and its not.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #58
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Agreed, but, the plan was to get promoted ASAP, then rent wouldn't have been a problem, agreed?

Further more, I wasn't encouraging TF to move from the RICOH, just they are better choices than Nuneaton or Hinckley.

Dongazalos... Seriously, 2k!?!? At least 6k.
Click to expand...

It's only 10k now on the back of a bit of success imagine having to travel the extra 20 to 30 miles plus parking on top of the costs of tickets. A lot of people would boycott SISU for forcing the club out of Coventry when a reasonable offer was on the table. To the extent more would attend the away games to make the point
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #59
wingy said:
I actually thought that was around what we'd get for this season at the Ricoh 7-8k. max.We often lambast the no-shows but maybe we should appluad the ones who stick with it.:claping hands:
Click to expand...

Attendances will only increase if we are winning games.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #60
dongonzalos said:
It's only 10k now on the back of a bit of success imagine having to travel the extra 20 to 30 miles plus parking on top of the costs of tickets. A lot of people would boycott SISU for forcing the club out of Coventry when a reasonable offer was on the table. To the extent more would attend the away games to make the point
Click to expand...

2k is just ridiculous.

We got 10k in our 1st home game of the year on a Tuesday night...
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 15, 2012
  • #61
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Attendances will only increase if we are winning games.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're threatening to third-fill the ground with the way things are going.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?