Search results

This was amongst one of the articles on/in the telegraph: " It's also understood to be one of the most lucrative deals yet for the football club in terms of their share of revenue from matchday car parking as well and food and beverages. " Meaning the deal, not only being a decent length but...

Tells you all about our chances! A point against a relegation rival like Birmingham will not save us.

It's goals that will save us not clean sheets. More dropped points today. MR can only work with the talent we have and it's simply not good enough at this level. I'd rather lose by two or three and attack than resigned to 0-0 defensive draws, little action and even less hope. MR has to turn...

Well it's about time! Please learn from the Ricoh and design a proper stadium not a soulless bowl of doom. Rectangles not Bowls!

Finally! One more step but crucially, crucially is villa going down do we think?

I thought Sunderland were quite poor, long ball team without any real quality and a manager who loves whinging. We were only uncomfortable by our own mistakes and unfortunate missed chances. The run continues and that's what will get us over the line, keep on building that inevitably of a goal...

Massive five minutes here. Keep the faith!

Sky favouring Sunderland to absolute no surprise. Better off sticking with CWR.

Perhaps I should keep quiet for now...

Arguably the worst team we've played this season? We could have been up 3 or 4 nil by now!

I'll take just the promotion for now thanks.

:smuggrin:

You have deliberately sought inference as an excuse to duck scrutiny of your wildly inaccurate personal slurs. I take your dismissal as admitting your comments were completely false.

Still insulting my character and not my argument. Stay classy. Am I right in thinking you are referring to this post: Or a different one? I can't reply until you clarify where you specifically pointed out the hypocrisy (of my reply).

Quote exactly where I said as such. A deliberate strawman. It is entirely the point and entirely correct. You expect and demand that the Telegraph should be building bridges whilst doing nothing yourself. That's pretty funny. Still an ad hominem though. Got anything relevant to say?

The inference is quite obvious. Now you're being obtuse. No, I do not. You stated you found my comment on Fergusons_Beard's post as ironic when I mentioned hypocrisy. I am asking in what way is my post hypocritical? I have not claimed that I am building bridges in any way. Fergusons_Beard...

Perhaps you could answer my question instead of just insulting me? Hardly a reply in good faith, eh?

Provide proof to your claim.

You answered your own question, which you may have realized if you calmed down before proof reading your initial post. But by all means, keep ranting and talk of, to quote your exact words whilst being completely hypocritical.

Shows where the telegraph lie, what by asking genuine questions over a project that has yet to materialize? Your strawman arguments don't hold up against the very real pressing questions - what is the long term plan for this club by SISU and when, if ever, will they achieve those plans? To my...