Search results

They (15 year olds) will be able to vote next year, supposedly. Madness.

Peter will be exhausted.

I like successfully landing.

A terrible reflection on Trump that this should be your first thought.

2 Has the lelegraph accurately reported Hansard? If so it isn’t a bullshit article.

They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though, so it’s not literally any old shit.

Overqualified.

Haven’t the days of a two horse race long gone?

But wasn’t.

They hope the giving will be noticed but the taking back less so. It’s a con, directly linked to by-election results. Incompetence from the outset. Claiming they can do it because of stability they have brought to the economy 🤣.

If they hadn’t mentioned change quite so often it wouldn’t have made such an impression.

You play a role in that as well.

Social enterprise, not quite a private provider. It’s who they are contracted to provide the service to, not who provides it that is key. Sounds iffy to me.

Written off by whom?

Speculation.

Far too little, too late.

The money wasn’t wasted until the scheme was cancelled, without the option of a refund, by the Labour government.

Different money.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/boy-denied-treatment-nhs-hospital-private-school-kingston-richmond-b1231805.html