Search results

Where’s Grendull going to sit then? ;)

Hope you’re right. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. At least for another season anyway. Who knows maybe longer.

Our membership is based on being a member of the EU. We’ll have to renegotiate our membership not only with all other WTO members also all remaining EU member states and the EU itself because IIRC as the EU is also a member in it’s own right. Could be straight forward but it’s far from a given...

As a member of the EU. Whether we’re allowed to remain a member automatically when we leave the EU is still to be determined. We may yet have to apply for membership as a single entity when we leave.

It’s going to come as a shock to you if it turns out that they all have dark skin, curly hair and blue eyes. They’ll probably demand you leave because they don’t want honkeys diluting their culture. What will you do then?

Aside from what JS has said isn’t the BPA going 3G in the summer? As far as I know 3G pitches aren’t permitted in the league so a move to BPA seems unlikely on the basis of the pitch alone. At least for next season. Don’t go up this season followed by relegation next then who knows.

I can read. You seem to have yourself conveniently fixated on one small detail while conveniently ignoring the bigger picture that people don’t want to deal with the club under the current owners. The outcome of their behaviour (which has led to a situation where no one wants to deal with us)...

Gotcha So basically unless they cancel his contract by mutual consent making him a free agent we can’t sign him outside the window? Assuming that the two guys who went remained non league and can move outside the window?

Wasn’t we supposedly in the hunt for a Dagenham and Redbridge player during the window and made a bid that was rejected? Seems odd that they rejected a bid in the window if true only to tell players that they’re free to leave now if they can find a club. Does this mean that the player we’ve...

The point is that literally no one and I do mean literally no one wants to deal with the club while SISU are involved. CRFC for whatever reasons CCC for whatever reasons Higgs for what ever reason The current board at NTFC apparently for whatever reason Maybe even MK for whatever ever reason...

Understand all that but even then the appeal process means it’s central government who has the final say on planning not CCC. If JS wanted to deal with SISU I’d be pretty sure he wouldn’t have to worry about SISU coming to the table in an appeal and any subsequent legal proceedings should the...

I never said you did say it had been applied. Take a look in the mirror if you want to accuse people of struggling to read. CD said that CCC had blocked a move to BPA. They haven’t. They’ve never had the opportunity. You then jumped in rather than acknowledging CD had posted an inaccuracy...

It only helps the FL justify it. They haven’t got the backbone to oppose SISU or the financial clout to risk a court case with them. SISU don’t need a case, the FL are running scared.

We’re all aware of what sisu have done. We’re also all aware of what CCC have done and the fact is unlike what you’ve claimed CCC haven’t blocked anything. They haven’t had to, Jon Sharp blocked a move while SISU are in charge so there isn’t even an opportunity to test the theory. That’s the...

It’s also a known fact that the clause has never been applied so doesn’t exist. It’s also a known fact that JS has said not while SISU are involved and given that John Sharp is the first hurdle. So it’s complete bollocks to say that the council have blocked it. Who’s whipping what up exactly. If...

You don’t know yet if Wasps have agreed it and changed their mind, you don’t know yet if SISU have changed their mind. We don’t know yet if anything has been agreed to walk away from. It’s all speculation, Chinese whispers and here say. If wasps have changed their mind or were unwilling to...

The blame, no. Some blame, yes. It shouldn’t exonerate SISU though especially as they carry the majority of the blame.

If the local Rugby club that we’re not suing doesn’t want to be our landlord it really shouldn’t be a surprise that a franchised in Rugby club who we are suing doesn’t want to be either. Maybe it’s all CRFC’s fault too. So long as we don’t shoulder SISU with any of the blame you’ll be happy.

The council haven’t had anything to block. It’s the lease holder who’s blocked it and you know it. Why bullshit? Let’s just deal in reality for a change. The reality is Coventry RFC once again rule out Coventry City FC groundshare Let’s not try and pretend it’s any different. It isn’t and it...

Agree totally. The story I heard from him is that Northampton have given us a solid no on the possibility of return so we were exploring MK as an alternative. He heard it in the stands at Sixfields, hence I’ve taken it with a pinch of salt.