Search results

How? Chopping and changing managers can still work for a club overall I'm not saying I want to go back to that. I'm just saying if new manager doesnt last 7 years it doesn't mean the club will be in turmoil

If we go on a run with new manager of 10 wins ina. Row would you still say king is an idiot for sacking robins? Just curious

If we do t have enough money then council can step in and help out paying it.....always ends well

This is what makes me sad. It won't tarnish it , will just make me sad. Like an ex lover marrying someone else I guess

Chelsea sack managers all the time and are fine. It can also work.

Clearly you ain't as anti sisu as you like to believe then

The manager having full control is on its way out now though at most clubs And king sees robins as the issue not the new coaches clearly

These guys are crazy immature

Eh? Most football clubs see the owners sack the manager.

You have said yourself on here that owners don't sack themselves I remember. So it's nothing new

Comes down to the DOF or owner usually I believe And we won't have a dof....but we have a doug

or the manager? I doubt king sacked robins if he knew boateng or Carr were an issue?

Again stop being silly. It means less hassle when you do need to change a manager. Focus on one issue not having to completely change everything about the club with ever new manager you hire who has different ways of working

Well find out of it's cos they r shit or just played with less than ideal tactical set up Can't say for now

Man U recruitment has long been an issue though. We on paper have a structure in place that should keep things consistent even with manager changes

Thought it was the national team as they kicked off about training intensity? Suarez in particular

Oooh this would be amazing At Uruguay though

He seems data driven not looking to meet idols?

He's just being a child today