Search results

Upon tactical instruction to offer an extra body in attack when we're chasing a goal and looking to overload their back line, as he's very good aerially and poses a physical threat.... he hasn't got a bad shot on him either. That still doesn't at all make him the right choice in the event all...

I'm frankly amazed you're bothering to post after your sensational claim that we should be playing Thomas as a striker.

No one has said anything about settling for mediocrity? It's pointing out the likely minimum points needed which for us means a lot of leeway between now and the end of the season.

Yeah based on PPG I'd be astounded if 90 was needed. None of the current top 6 bar us and Boro have shown they can go on a serious run. A club within the top 6 currently would have to win both of their games up until Game Week 24 then get 50 points across the remaining half season to reach that...

You should keep tabs on my posts more! You might actually learn something!

Rather than being determined not to go for him I think it's more that while he's under contract at Newcastle the FA just simply wouldn't be able to afford his existing wages, nor his release clause.

Oh really. I wouldn't be shocked. He's one of those "but if he came good" type players which some managers will get tempted by.

If you're looking to hit teams on the counter, which Bristol did, then naturally he's going to cause problems as that level of pace and power is always going to pose a threat. But being that technically inept will make even your more better games look pretty crap - average in the grand scheme...

He was a handful at times, but his end product was very poor. I wouldn't really recommend basing his entire ability off a relatively OK performance. His all round play 'can' be good but a big part of that is because he's both ridiculously physical and quick. Technically he's very limited and...

Terrific athlete, crap footballer. No thanks.

Well maybe you'll manage it one day. Maybe start with the FB lot first, they're more within your IQ range.

I mean it's hardly gone but okay. Enjoy your day.

*You're. Point proven.

It's hilarious how much of a little idiot you actually are. Did you read the article I referenced when you were crying about wanting evidence. Or are you too thick to read.

Your life must be going swimmingly if you place that much emphasis on reaction score.

Says the childish idiot that can't accept he's wrong. Own it, you'll feel better.

You do realise you're talking to yourself. I've also never said he's coming to play as a 10. I said he can play as a 10 when you claimed he's an out and out winger when he's not as he's played in multiple midfield roles. At this point you're really coming across as quite thick.

Incredible. 2 in 2 posters that can't read posts properly. Must be a slow day, quite literally.

Although he's played there in the past probably not in the Championship. I would've thought if he's played there the bulk of those apps would've been for Barnet in the NL, maybe a handful for Peterborough. So it's not really comparable. McNeil has performed well as a 10 for Everton in the PL...

So to summarise. If there's a need, he can indeed play there and there's evidence that proves as such. Didn't need it, but thanks for confirming.