Search results

Exactly. The EU stated very clearly from the moment that the referendum date was set that being out of the EU will never be as good as being in the EU. There’s no juxtaposed of position here, this has been a constant.

It is pathetic. Blaming those that didn’t vote for this shitfest rather than taking ownership of your own vote is pathetic. Quite often the people who do this are the same ones who get upset at the suggestion that they didn’t know what they voted for and/or they were too thick to understand what...

If I wanted to celebrate us getting a shite deal I’d have voted leave. The only people failing to accept the reality of Brexit is those who voted for it. Grow up, take ownership of your vote and stop looking to those who voted opposite to you as someone sort of scapegoat with the nonsense you...

Then why the faux shock and anger about the EU’s behaviour from sections of the press and sections of Brexit voters. We keep getting told that they know what they voted for so if that’s true then this is nothing to be either shocked or angered by. It’s just part of the process that they voted...

Noticed it to. I think it’s because he posts, then Google’s what you said, realises that you’re on to something so has to go back quickly and delete his post in case he looks stupid and then sit back in the glow of knowing he’s dodged that bullet.

We should have given them back decades ago. Along with all the stuff we stole from Egypt, let’s give that back.

That’s pretty much what Boris’ sister said when she was saying how her brother only represents the disaster capitalists that have backed him.

That’s just project fear.

When we do just remember it was the leavers that voted for it not remainers so if you’re looking to apportion blame make sure it’s on those that voted for it not the ones that didn’t. #weknowwhatwevotedfor

Define difficult?

The faux shock and anger from the press over this. Come on, it’s not like some of them have spent decades telling us that the EU is a protectionist organisation. Wait... no, they have. Still, at least brexiteers aren’t falling for it like simpletons. Wait...

He would have to have turned up first.

Your tax money says otherwise. And that’s actually the point that you’ve missed.

Everybody I personally know that voted Brexit also support abolishing the Monarchy. So it could be a vote winner.

You also don’t need to look very far to see that this guys “thinking” is so flawed that he’s the last person anyone should be hiring as an advisor on anything. Seriously did the government do no due diligence on this guy? Shocking.

He can do that anyway, Cummings is running the country. Boris is like the Colonel. Just because his face is on the bucket it doesn’t mean he’s out the back frying the chicken.

Didn’t see the BBC one but to be fair all their Tory leadership debates and GE debates were just tosh.

Have to agree. She also doesn’t carry the baggage of being part of the shadow cabinet that lost the last election so badly. Went into this debate expecting Starmer to come out of it best (not that he’s come out of it bad) but Nandy is definitely a yard or two ahead of him and a lap in front of...

Don’t think it was working. Although if it was a competition it was a photo finish between him and Boris for who’s said the most despicable thing’s on the record.

It was easier than having to sack him as that could have been seen as an acknowledgement that his appointment was a mistake in the first place.