Search results

Football doesn't work that way does it? Just because McG did that at that time, doesn't mean something else would've happened like a goal from someone else, for example, a game we won 1-0, because McG scored, we took the gas off but still won, we could've scored in the last min to win, but Baker...

He was an example of most most managers talking shit. Robinson at MK did it to us, Crawley's to us, Bury's AM to us... Loads of managers do it, to either; boost players' confidence or take blame off their shoulders, PUBLICALLY, but in private, they'd 'grill 'em'. Warnock was one of he worst...

Take away McGs goals and it's only 9 points we lose.

Most managers talk absolute bollocks, Robins was the only manager we had we said how it was in my time as a supporter. Ferguson chats out of his arse, he'll do anything but blame his players, he's really bad for it. Hardly a shit manager is he.

You do know Grendel meant Thorn, not TrueSkyBlueLiam... He should have used commas.

Bournemouth were in a worse situation after more games, clearly 8 games don't define a season.

It started to go sour with Robins before he left, without Clarke, he would've done just as bad IMO.

Linnell called you out and you hid away, bore off.

Bournemouth appointed Howe after we appointed Robins, Bournemouth were lower than us, yet were champions before that finish at Griffin Park and at no point did we win 3 in a row. Apart from November and December, it's been an awful season. Robins turned us around, but our position wasn't as bad...

You certainly are 'special'.

I remember when I did that in Geography at school. I'd say Football is religion-like, most certainly.

Are you for real?! It was clearly a sarcastic comment saying an injured Murphy would be better than a fully fit Dunn after his horror show v Crewe. :facepalm: You certainly don't deviate from that Schmuck label I gave you.

I said Fleck starts under Pressley, in fact, he's played well lately, been a hell a lot better than Bailey, Moussa (really disappointed with him lately) and Jennings easily. My point is that in a 4-4-2, Fleck will start under Pressley, so who do you play with him, and I pretty much said that...

My bad, completely forgot when posting. In saying that, Murphy would still be better...

No, the Max Clayton example was to refute the claim that playing an inexperienced player on his own is suicidal, obviously, it isn't, as I firmly believe, 'if you're good enough, you're old enough', and if Wilson or Philliskirk at 20 can't hack meaningless L1 games, then, I'm sorry, but they...

No, you have flawed logic, whatever people's opinions are of me, they can't say I have flawed logic. The latest example is, "playing 2 striker doubles you chances of scoring", evidence? There's none, if it was the case, why do the best teams only play 1 striker? Also, I'll refute that on a CCFC...

I did, so what? I wasn't using it that context because your definition is simply out of date and actually, irrelevant. Schmuck is used in the same context as I said, which is to say some is a fool etc. End of discussion surely?

Murphy Christie Martin Wood Adams Baker Thomas Barton Fleck Moussa If it's not Clarke, does it matter who plays upfront?

Max Clayton is a great of example of this, not! He's 17 and he had a season in L2 when he was 16, he could hack it because he's good enough. There's just no evidence to support your claims, how's getting taken off a bad thing? It's tactical or they just didn't play well, probably because they...

Thanks for the reply. Perhaps in the summer when I have more spare time after: schoolwork, work, rugby, and social commitments. I would've joined the trust at the last 2 home games... But I've been late to both of them! :facepalm: and I don't like doing online transactions involving...