Search results

Now Willis has gone we HAVE to bring in another defender don't we and it has to be one who is eligible to play in this competition. The CT seem to be suggesting that Harries may well go today too. For the semi-final that would then leave us with Clarke out, Foley out, Rawson out, Willis out...

Maybe I haven't been paying that much attention over the years, but doesn't the new press secretary for the White House come across as nasty, spiteful and patronisingly arrogant?

But besides that it is all sunshine and hunky doryness.

We will only rise again once Sisu are gone. It is abundantly clear that there is no desire or drive or motivation to propel this club forwards and only an inclination to let it just tick along.

Yeah. I would be much more irked if he was a very good player. I just see him as distinctly average and very much part of a terribly leaky defence. It IS a tricky one of course because we are looking likely that we won't be in this division next season. Do we go for League One players who...

Well yeah. If it is a mass fire sale and them buggering off we would accept that wouldn't we? We look doomed anyway. Sell Stevenson, Harries, Haynes, Willis, get some Wilson money, bugger off into the night.

It is a very odd position to come to terms with if true. The norm is for the chairman and the board of a club to be desperate to avoid relegation and to talk of how bad a thing it would be and how unacceptable a situation it is. Here we hear nothing. Can only put that down as an acceptance...

Yes, I agree. Would rather wait though until the assumed becomes fact. ;)

As City fans we have a tendency to react to one piece of news when it might not be the full picture.

But Stevenson going has been on the cards now for some weeks. Why would fans lose control when we expected it anyway? I maintain we wait and see what happens tomorrow. Maybe Slade will have some good news for us all. If tomorrow he was to say 'We lost Willis and Stevenson, but Chris Stokes...

Not so sure. What if I send you the file and you have a look and you see if it contains a virus? Then you can send it back to me. Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

Could it be that Seppala has rejected Christianity and has embraced Buddhism? Fisher has shaved his beard off? I don't expect it will be anything we will find the slightest bit interesting. Unless of course the new commercial director is a joint role and going to be a Gilbert/Reed combo.

Seems to me that most people don't believe Willis to be that good a player and someone who is rather average anyway. So why are we all upset he is going? We might all just be surprised at who is coming in tomorrow. If no-one comes in at all of course and others are to go too, THEN is the time...

Exactly!!

Been a rumour for a while that he isn't happy, so maybe this is Willis saying he wants off. If a player doesn't want to play for us I would rather he wasn't here personally. Maybe it will all be clearer by the end of play tomorrow.

I would sell him today rather than tomorrow. If it has become clear today that he is going a new he wants to leave I would much rather do it today than tomorrow. That would give me a day to replace him if I needed to. Maybe Stokes is on the way back. If he is back he can play centre half and...

A club who has a poor defence and has been shipping in silly goals all season? Defence has been very poor all season. Don't think we should be unhappy losing anyone to be quite honest.

It if the two bids were unacceptable then he was still our player and surely there was no guarantee that Rotherham would have come back with a third offer.

Players not paid for last week? Would explain the lack of effort. Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

Errmm, don't quite get some of the annoyance in this thread. Surely we appealed the sending off because at the time he was our player. What if a deal didn't ever get agreed with Rotherham? Surely you treat your player as your player until he is your player no more. There was no guarantee that...