Search results

I refer to my earlier post about him Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Christ Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes but 5 years older Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Companies House Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Just the wrong marsupial really Coca Koala is the one Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

There was a polarisation in a minority of the population, most didn't really care. The media gave far greater weight to it (Farage got the kind of airtime even pre referendum that any other party with no MPs just wouldn't get) and made it more of an issue than it is or was. Sent from my...

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I'm selling my house in exchange Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I've just agreed to pay £5.50 for a pint Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

He's building one in Blackburn instead Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

He's a decent player but I just don't think there is a role for him in the way they play now, he's got a great left foot but not sure where he'd fit in if we signed him either

They are terrible owners who are only using the club to extract what they can and holding its assets hostage. Don't confuse their non-involvement in the day to day running of the club with any benevolence.

Here's one of your Sensible Moderate Tories having a normal one Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I'm not sure of the significance of one charge against just Ryton and the other against all the assets of the company, wondered whether its related to the value of each charge. Perhaps they have put some money in to invest in the new pitches at Ryton and that's the first charge?

Trezeguet I think was mentioned too

Andrew Driver - currently being watched for the 100th time by Andy Thorn

But it's a bit easier at a lower level, it gets harder to replace players of O'Hare's class because you are competing with clubs that are far better off and can offer much better. It was relatively easy for us to replace McNulty for example because we were only competing realistically with other...

It's not really relevant, the facts are we'll be selling our best player, widely recognised as our key man and will not be able to spend all of the income on a replacement. It's going to be really difficult for the outcome not to be a regression in the overall quality of the sqiad.

They're not really a tinpot club to be fair to them, they've won more than we have and spent a longer time in the top flight than we have too. They also got to the prem in a relatively debt free position, it's only come about since the new owners came in who used the club's own money to buy the...

It's not even a reasonable amount, it's an amount sufficient to ensure that the squad's overall standard does not regress