Search results

From what I've seen I can't see Murphy making an impact in the premier league in his career, he should be able to develop into a very good championship player though.

One of Southends goal was a penalty, the curled shot was against Crewe.

They'd look at cctv evidence in the pub, club, street or wherever of you two meeting, possibly socialising for a bit and then leaving together willingly. As well as witnesses statements who saw the two of you together backing up the above cctv evidence. Exactly like happened with Macdonald

3-1 win

He means people are prejudiced in their opinions against Burge, obviously they are playing on a level field. But he's saying that people are harsher in there criticism of Burge than they would be towards to RCC for a similar scenario. I think he has a point to degree, but its not without reason...

What about Rochdale away?

The thing is, the only major thing I see is if they could prove she was lying about her memory loss. So unless she's admitted to one of the witnesses that she remembers or slipped up and implies she remember I don't see the point, that's why I said it could be interesting to see what was said in...

It was said neither ejaculated I believe, Evans claimed he pulled out and stopped as he was afraid he was girlfriend would ring him

You could be right I don't really know, maybe they just thought there was no further need to look for DNA as they admitted having sex

She thought her drink may have been spiked as she couldn't remember how she got to the hotel room.

Well neither ejaculated so there was no semen, I'm not really sure what other ways they have obtaining dna in rape cases. It was the next day she went to the police (but remember she never claimed rape so they wouldn't have been looking for DNA straight away) I'm not sure how long it took for...

I think you have a decent point about the law, I don't think it was designed with this sort of case i mind. As for your question if that person can demonstrate they genuinely believed they had your consent then as far as I understand then no they wouldn't be guilty.

That is exactly right, there was no DNA evidence that sex had taken place so if they had both lied and said it didn't happen there would be no case.

Maybe I'm wrong but I get the feeling from the article that a lot of the 'witnesses' mentioned aren't actually witnesses to the events/night but more character witnesses to attack her with. Example The new witnesses have spoken of meeting the victim – who was 19 at the time of the 2011 rape...

Would I be cynical if I said I imagine it was cleverly leaked by his team to get people believing he is not guilty and try and influence his appeal verdict.

Nope she never claimed rape, or claimed that she wasn't raped. She has always said she couldn't remember what happened, there would have been no case if Evans and Macdonald hadn't admitted to having sex. Macdonald was charged but found not guilty at trial, its because it was decided he had...

The thing that piques my interest from the article is the conversation of surprising details during a taxi journey, would be interesting to know whats said and its implications. Other than that it just seems to be criticising the investigating officers (which whilst its important they act...

No championship games this wekk Fleetwood new manager happens to be ex cov In great form and could be top after game in hand And still we barely got a mention and were second last on

Its absurd, New Zealand are far better than us and Rugby Union is the national sport over there. Couldn't really care anyway, world cup interest is over. Funny how all the purist rugby fans though get on there high horse when other take an interest in the world cup though. Heard the other day...

Well the fact that Pressley managed to does suggest exactly that