Search results

Towards the end of the season teams at the bottom are usually the worst to have to play against!

so you agree its a windfall for sisu rather than the club?

What do you think I'm suggesting? My understanding of accounts is that at the start of the financial year the clubs budget will have been set, at which point we are told sisu would be funding the losses for the coming year. Now it would seem that they have had an unbugeted windfall, of...

Thank you for your enlightening view. Can you just answer then why acl accounts have never shown the council taken money out of the company? Also, if acl have never made a profit (according to you), where has this money come from for the council to take?

Either way, this team is a top 6 team at best. With the -10 we needed to be a top 2 team to stand a chance.

Interesting that acl accounts have never shown the council taking money out of the ground. I suppose the accounts could have been a mess so it would all be OK in that case.

Nothing wrong with using the money to fund the clubs losses. However, it means that sisu aren't funding all the losses. Therefore that particular credit to sisu can't be given. They can't have it both ways, wanting praise for funding the losses whilst using money generated from unexpected...

Add the 10 points back on and I see a team a team 2 points off the play offs.

Good job the league approved the move to sixfields so we could fulfill our fixtures

No we need 40 points. Only the very top teams are going to get anywhere near that.

40 points from 19 games is needed. For us to reach the play offs we now have to be the best team in the league until the end of the season. Not just one of the best, but the very best, and by some margin. I'm just curious as to why you think that's likely?

Good man.

Basically to have any chance we can't lose more than 4 games. Too much to ask I think.

He's in that academy.

There aren't even these big sites available locally anyway. That only leaves undeveloped land, and I will put my neck on the line here and say there is zero chance of getting a football stadium built on greenbelt land.

I didn't intend to misquote you, I am just concerned about some of the things that are happening here. The current situation is either: A) Some of the local authorities have lied in response to FOI requests, a very serious crime. B) Fisher and Labovitch have lied. I'm just trying to...

Lol! So some junior council official earning £20k a year is going to risk a prison sentence to help sisu keep a secret! That is the best yet.

Are you saying that the surrounding local authorities replied with false information to the FOI requests? You do realise that a civil servant who responds to a FOI request with false information could potentially be looking at a custodial sentence for such a crime?

Just a quick question RFC. Do you think our owners are stupid enough to buy land for a stadium without discussing it with the local authority first?

Exactly. At the moment CCFC is playing in Northampton with no plan to return. Even if I believed that they are serious in building a new stadium (which im not) there is still no plan. All they have is an IDEA that they want to build a new ground. That isn't a plan.