Search results

In which direction?

We live under FPTP, why on earth would I, a lifetime Labour voter, want the Liberal Democrats to hold the balance of power in parliament? It went so well in 2010.

Tell me again how tax paying for spending is economics 101 [emoji1782]

Don't tell PVA

It's already a Labour seat though, so a Tory disaster is irrelevant in the sense that it doesn't win a new seat for Labour at the next election

Cheers PVA I'm glad you're relying on Dan Hodges

50% here

For the hundredth time, I live in a key marginal and Labour has made practically no gains here, this should set alarm bells going somewhere

You seem to not understand that a bad day for the Tories ≠ a good day for Labour I've read all week centrist arseholes on Twitter tell people they're "obliged to vote for Labour in a 2 party system" and yet Labour has won less than half of the seats shed by the Tories.

It's a piss poor performance from Labour, in the midst of everything this is the best they can manage.

The important thing is whether it shows convincingly that Labour is likely to win sufficient seats to win a majority. I'm not convinced based on local experience (knife edge Tory seat) where local Tories have sadly mostly kept their seats even with a big turnout. Even the Philosopher's firm has...

The motorcade was so vast you thought you'd be there all night long

Good for tubs containing 3 flavours of ice cream?

He will sign one somewhere someday with somebody

I'm with you mate but they're not from Coventry

The burden on whom? Tax does not pay for spending. It is simply impossible.

Why don't they engage / consult with supporters' groups first before releasing this sort of thing? It's quite embarrassing really.

Tory won by 17 votes from Labour in my ward, 50% turnout apparently.

The right to vote includes the right not to

Better turnouts in one of the wards adjacent to mine (49%) and the two incumbent Tories have held their seat.