Search results

How do you know the figure he believes it to be? Hasn't said it (on this thread at least), but my understanding about the HMRC policy is the same as yours. They made a decision to reject ALL CVAs regarding football clubs because it is the only industry (as far as I know) where inequalities...

[email protected] This was the one I sent it to...posted on forum a few days back

Lol...ever the optimist eh Torch???

Dear Mr Clarke, Further to my email last night - if I am interpreting Mr Justice Males' comments correctly, he appears to me to be saying the that the owners of our Club (the same owners whose bid for CCFC Ltd was accepted by the Administrator, & who passed the FL "fit & proper" test)...

Sent this yesterday (no response so far).... Dear Mr Clarke, I was interested in the contents of your presentation at the above. Particularly the following quoted in various media: - “The problem with the Fit and Proper Person (owners’) Test is it requires people to have done things...

As long as it wasn't paid to the club we'll let him off. Although it might have been better spent on a proper haircut Deano!?

IMO...you are right to an extent, in that ACL reached a point where they thought they had a chance of a sensible sale. As a Hedge-fund SISU at that precise moment know that the Ricoh is theirs for a much lower price if they distress ACL. SISU certainly want the Ricoh...as most of us agree - at...

1. I think some on here are in danger of finding themselves on incitement charges 2. SISU (under any banner) have shown complete disregard for everything & everyone except for their complete & utter love of money above all else. The only way to make them listen or genuinely consider anything is...

SISU may well be encouraged by the attendance figures though...& the team demoralised...if they score do they get cheers? Bet most of those attending would be unable to resist watching!

Huh? So it's okay for you to play outside the city...? Double-standards or what??? ;-)

Surely with the admission fee £5 regulars could pay for admissions for 2 additional non-regulars (due to finances perhaps?) & ensure a sell-out!?

Personally I think enough people have player contacts on twitter to get the message across to them that our protest is with the owners only. Therefore we stay away from Northampton completely. I think a much bigger attendance at the Ricoh would get better publicity - & send a much clearer...

Apart from who?

Regardless of what some think of him - he did turn us around last season. Then he did right by himself & his family if the reasons he went were because he foresaw this mess. I bear him no animosity, & wish him well. Who knows...if he believes the club is "in my blood"...maybe he'll come back...

He's telling the truth. There are no plans. He's just missing out the additional bit that they have been told as soon as someone makes an offer they can leave or similar. In fact it appears there are no plans full stop!!!

Nobody knows what the outcome of their actions will be. Not going may lead to a hasty SISU exit rather than continue to incur losses. That could mean they sell-up, or close the club down, or they could just carry on regardless...they certainly have a history of the latter. This is why it's...

It would present a dilemma. Maybe we should relent & support the team in those cicumstances. The biggest game of their lives (& a lot of ours!) PLUS lack of support at Sickfields will be commonly accepted. Selling a massive amount of seats would refocus attention on the plight & probably be bad...

Rent is only even a cost (let alone "fixed") if you pay it. Player contracts can be re-negotiated to monthly or whatever...& if become too expensive they aren't renewed.

Actually that it correct (apologies to PWKH) it was an ACL statement...but the rest is still valid argument.

Having a case, & having the proof, to get the decision that justifies the cost of bringing the case, are miles apart once you get to see the bill mounting up.