You can't just look at one player being sold at a massively overvalued price and say that's ok if the buying club wants to pay it. If the buying club then sells another massively overpriced player back to the selling club, would that become the subject of an anti money laundering investigation...
I don't think anyone at our end could be blamed.
Stamenic was deemed to be the better signing, but unfortunately he dicked us about, and his end made sure it was played out in public for his own benefit.
Yes, it's pretty obvious we haven't run out of money, I think we will buy the right players when they are available. If not we wait. It's a proper 5 year plan.
Our defence is ok and plenty good enough for top 6.
Of course it could be improved with new (better) players but the goals conceded so far are not through a lack of ability, we just need our defence worked on by the coaches and our best combination to be allowed to settle in together.
Yes, but he is definitely in Brighton's plans. He played some part in most or all of their pre season friendlies and did well against Villarreal, and particularly QPR.
Highlights are on youtube
I think we had him a bit too early.
He came on for Brighton on Saturday against Everton. He was only on for a few minutes but looked good and scored a "goal" that looked OK but was very marginally ruled out by VAR.
This is it, calling out a bad performance is one thing, but people need to realise that some of the early comments were abuse, and I'm sure those posters wouldn't be happy if such abuse were aimed at them.
And some people don't realise that being called dog shit awful, and worse on social media can affect players in the same way as if any employee was treated that way in their job.