Search results

I’m sure that never happened in the past 🫤

Presumably to stop 3 people meeting at lunchtime, voting unanimously for a strike and then expecting the other 100 workforce to join them.

It will be interesting to see what the unintended consequences of some of those will be.

Highly unlikely.

And will do so under Labour whilst the Tories have pledged to ensure state pension is always tax free.

I suppose this is reactionary bollocks.

Shame not all first timers buy a house in Coventry.

FFS, the stamp duty break is for first time buyers. I didn’t invent it, nor did I invent Starmers fuck up. According to you it won’t be missed at all - so it will be no great loss. Unlike winter fuel allowance, bus passes and free prescriptions for pensioners.

You are a miserable so and so aren’t you. Or are you suggesting that nobody benefitted from that tax break?

He got it mixed up with stamp duty relief for first time buyers which will end in April 25. Labour won’t be extending it. That should be helpful for first time buyers - not. Probably see another increase in house prices in the run up as well...

Does it ”run out in a couple of years”?

But the EU is 2035 And most of the car manufacturers are European. I'm pretty sure I watched a Shell tv ad this week extolling their electric infrastructure plans to be achieved by 2035. I’m not sure Starmers move is anything to do with the industry, more likely to make Labour appealing to...

Thank you, an interesting article.

I just don’t think banning new ICE vehicles from 2030, when the rest of the EU which Starmer loves is aiming for 2035. I am totally unconvinced that the generating and distribution capacity will be there, nor the public charging system. The roads will need massive investment to take the...

I think they get all of £2,000 if they scrap it though.

Article doesn’t identify improvements in air quality achieved or improvement in health.

You only need to look at how JSO activists are let off scot free to then go and spray that affront to the environment - Stonehenge - orange to understand that the judiciary are biased. Khan has pocketed millions from drivers. I do like some old cars, I also like a lot of new ICE vehicles. I...

The judiciary in general and especially the Supreme Court, introduced by Labour, is pretty left wing. The recent decision in relation to oil drilling in Surrey was yet another example of their bias and lack of common sense.

Or just raising revenue. https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/ulez_expansion_is_more_about_money_than_clean_air I was responding to a post suggesting that hardly any cars are affected by it, which surely can’t be the case.

I wonder why the ULEZ was introduced then? If it affects no one. Except it does.