Search results

That article isn't written by Les Reid.

This is what she said This 'process' is could well be a sale, who knows (shrugs shoulders)? Rest is here http://www.coventry.gov.uk/news/article/904/statement_by_councillor_ann_lucas_leader_of_coventry_city_council

Can I do the catering, should make a packet. :D

You need a 5 point scale then.. mainly SISU mostly SISU, partly CCC/ACL even mostly CCC/ACL, partly SISU mainly CCC/ACL

If owning the freehold was of the utmost importance why didn't it come up until recently?

But there is still a grey area, even if some officials/elected representatives wanted SISU out & (rather foolishly) said so or left a paper trail showing that was being considered, it is still more likely in my opinion that correspondence discussing the rationale for the actual loan was all fine...

I may have this wrong, but my analysis from 10,000 feet (ignoring details) is.. SUSU's argument is that public funds were used in support of an attempt to distress a private company (ie CCFC). CCC's defence is that there was no such conspiracy and funds were used to restructure the finances...

Good point, well made.

Football is a dog eat dog commercial operation, if you don't give the customers what they want then you must expect the business to suffer..

LOL, your pliancy will be rewarded with as many doggy biscuits as you can eat.

What is a mm in this context, I always though it was a millimetre?

Sepalla has never been a Director of CCFC, Otium or any other company in the CCFC group.

Is it clear what the terms of these valuations floated in the press were? I don't think so.

Has poll been posted on twitter anywhere, maybe Huckerby or some other famous ex-cov player will retweet if asked nicely.

How do they compare in terms of objectivity & fairness to the survey the club did prior to moving to Northampton?

You can read that as the costs do not include stewards, crowd doctor, crowd ambulance & player ambulance,.he said the stadium provide these, he did not say that they were included in the rent. And the police are not mentioned, they may have a cost.

This effectively means that if SISU disagree with a media article it becomes a personal risk to pass a link or reference to that article whether their objections have merit or not. It is a form of censorship IMHO as a body like SBT can't take a risk like that.

I think some details of this episode should be passed on to private eye ;-)

Chill guys..

I see the CT have given the letter to the trust asking for the guardian link removal the publicity they feel it deserves.. NONE WHATSOEVER... (ps happy to be proved wrong on that, if someone can find a link to the story)