Search results

theoretically next season we could be in the championship and NTFC in non league. while i'm sure NTFC have a solid core fan base there would sure to be more casual fans who would start to attend CCFC. the longer the stay in Northampton the more locals are likely to start going. If we're...

they most likely could as they have a lot of debt that can write off without losing any of their investment however the key difference would be any bid would be for ltd containing ownership of assets such as the golden share and registration. should SISU buy ltd they would also be buying the...

If Fisher came out and gave evidence we have purchased a site, has plans for the stadium, funding and timescales then I think it could be considered by many. Personally I'd also want some explanation of the business plan that shows we are better off with a new stadium than renting the Ricoh and...

not sure they would be able to ban CWR. don't they cover the games as part of a Football League contract with the BBC? if they refused CWR access to cover the games the BBC would be on to the league and they'd withhold our share of the media money. SISU aren't really in a position to be turning...

wouldn't make a difference to me, in fact it would just expose another Fisher lie. at the forums when he was asked about the drop in income due to lower crowds at NTFC he assured everyone it wasn't a problem as SISU would be covering it.

wonder if they've given up on it? my subscription has run out, not renewed but I've not had a single email suggesting I should sign up again. the videos seem to go on youtube and apparently todays match was available through the regular iplayer feed.

surely we are in this mess now because of SISU? Richardson was terrible for the club there's no doubting that but you have to draw a line under it at some point and that was when SISU took over without a requirement to pay off the old debt, essentially they picked up a debt free club for nothing...

could make a point of it, we haven't got a kit so everyones wearing a different old one. or the old PE pants and socks, Soccer AM would love something like that.

he doesn't really need to change his decision as the administration process isn't over. he can invite new bids based on new evidence and select a preferred bidder from those. the bigger issue is that he has allowed SISU to move assets out of Ltd whilst in administration. does he have the power...

Don't think anyone would argue Richardson got us in a right old mess but you can't escape the fact that SISU would (or at least should) have known exactly what the situation was when they took over and failed spectacularly at turning things round. You can't keep going back and blaming old...

this is the issue. if they'd come in on day one and said we need to change the rent deal or we need ownership to make the club sustainable chances are the vast majority of fans would have supported them. now it's a different story, we know what they're like! is anyone really confident that if...

spot on, imagine if this wasn't football club and it was a box making company or something. no one would be looking in this level of detail into what has been going on, SISU would have just done whatever they wanted through their chosen administrator and that would be the end of it. Also...

why stop at the Ricoh, why not give everything away. sure people will have no issue with all council owned facilities being given away to private companies for free.

will someone please post what the deal is with floodlight failures, it's annoying me know, can't find anything about it!

is it not the case that we are still in administration and therefore if one of the creditors (ACL) think the administrator is not doing his job properly can they not go back to the court and asked for him to be replaced?

it was, but it's on youtube somewhere I think

would guess so. we've got the players contracts, if you don't give us the share we'll take you to court etc. FL reaslise they've made a mistake and try to keep it quiet until players and share are reunited. will now hope it all blows over and they don't have to take any action.

Sheff is in this 30s now isn't he and probably on a decent wage for the level he's been playing at. A lot of clubs are looking to make savings so may not match his wages and he might not fancy moving his wife and kids out of the area if he thinks he's only got a year or two left in him. I'd...

they can do whatever they like with the golden share. the bigger issue is what legal action SISU will take against them and if they are prepared to defend it and what happens to the players. technically if SISU have them under contract and keep paying them they wouldn't move with the share...

we're in the area of what can be done legally v what is against league rules (should they ever decide to enforce any of them). you can transfer assets between companies you own so long as you're not up to something such as asset stripping. That may be the best route legally, someone would have...