Search results

Just drop London weighting completely then.

Tell Ed Millliband that.

The only band I would go to see abroad would be a Led Zeppelin reunion with Jason Bonham representing his dad.

They are taking industrial action to continue not travelling in to the office, ergo they are not travelling in to the office, it’s as simple as that. Presumably your logic would dictate that if they don’t travel into the office, they shouldn’t be paid London Weighting.

So, in the case of the ONS civil servants their employers (one of the two grours best placed to judge) are saying they want attendance at base two whole days a week. Seems reasonable.

Perfectly reasonable compensation for having to deal with the kids of today.

This with “better” rewards are going to get hammered in the budget. So yes, how very dare they,

If they are wfh they arent travelling to London so why pay the weighting allowance?

My wife’s friend has one. Constant range anxiety and huge cost and time added to journey if not charging at home. I bought a diesel.

Why do they need London weighting if they are not working in London?

They won’t be able to do that forever.

Surely the answer is - just don’t take it in the first place. I’d that’s where we get to then the ire will have been worth it,

Do two wrongs make a right? Part of the issue here are the pledges made before the election to clean up this sort of stuff. More Labour lies as they carefully carried the Ming vase.

There are lies, damned lies and statistics.😀 The stats can still be worked out later I hope those “based” in London have had their weighting allowance stopped,

The EV “sales” figures are flawed. Manufacturers are registering them, storing and selling at hugely discounted prices 6 months to 2 years later. This is destroying residuals and making used car dealers reluctant to take EVs in.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99v3x1m5pyo Will we notice? Will we care? Some salaries saved, let them stay on strike indefinitely,

You’re wrong, Coventry is the City of Rugby.

The fact Starmer is paying back some of his gifts is a bit like going back to a shop and paying for what you shoplifted a month ago - a tacit admission that you have done wrong and are trying to put it right. The crime of shoplifting has still been committed though.

The government will be taking a fair chunk. I thought you didn’t believe in accumulated wealth.

I do think he was trying to cover up / deflect from the piss poor job him and his team did.