Search results

There isn’t an EU army. Juncker doesn’t want one man ruling the EU. The finance minister would be limited to certain aspects of fiscal policy. You just deny the facts.

Where is the plan? Link?

He did say there were issues about migrants. No one is denying that. Throwing stones at their children will not redress the issues and only goes to show that there are scumbags on both sides.

Not in my lifetime. There are no plans for one.

The truth is that countries have recently joined the Euro, the Euro has gained against the pound and that no one is leaving the Euro. The aspects include VAT and corporation tax. We have had this conversation several times.

No. Let’s start by you admitting that you are not neutral. Then let’s start talking about a recent impact statement instead of some guy‘s guesswork in 1971. I couldn’t give a toss about something from 1971 that the rag called the Express dug out. We have have had years of elected...

Euro good. Countries still joining and no one leaving. No army and no Financiers taking over countries fiscal policies- only certain aspects. EU Parliament MEPs are voted in by people like you at the European Elections. Where were you at the vote?

We „funded“ the EU because it was good for us to do that, politically and economically. To fund a border that breaks the GFA and makes life harder for private and commercial people is totally stupid.

Sweden has taken refugees for decades. Nothing to do with the EU.

Well, that is not correct. There is no EU army and there are no open borders. You have to get into the Schengen zone first before you can travel freely. You wouldn’t mind being stopped for 5 minutes. One, where do get 5 minutes from? There are millions crossing borders every day. If you...

I know what an army is and what a Defence Union is. I know that we are in NATO, but that there’s no NATO army as such. A European Defence Union is pooling resources to defend Europe. Not so far from being a European version of NATO and, since Trump became president, well justified.

No. I mean, why won’t they release the Brexit impact papers?

Superstate? That is a propaganda word. EU government? No. More power to the EU democratically elected parliament? Yes, of course. An EU external border? Yes, of course. One currency for countries that meet the criteria and want it? Yes, of course. Where’s the problem? Now.., to the benefits of...

Have you not noticed the increase of civil servants and bureaucrats being recruited to work in the agencies replacing the work done by EU bureaucrats? You may be glad, but that doesn’t help.

How many refugees came to Britain? In other words the lies from Farage who stood before a poster of refugees in Croatia were the reason for voting leave. Extremely damaging? Not really. We signed up to the Geneva Convention for a reason. Germans know what it is to be a refugee fleeing an...

If there is a hidden agenda, it is trying to make a monumental cock up look good. No evidence of Brexit looking good yet. So we dig out papers from1971 and implicate Heath in unproven sex scandals. We have people talking about European armies, or non existent presidents of Europe and imagined...

Why are you so obsessed with incidents involving migrants?

No, just asking why the Brexit impact papers haven’t been released?

Says you who can’t know that it will be fine because we have not left yet. Yes the present government is weak, disorganised and lacking in a common policy for Brexit, and I can be therefore be justified in saying that, up until now Brexit is a cock up.

Maybe, but it is a Defence Union and is about pooling resources. 23 countries have signed up. Juncker has put forward a policy agenda which proposes an EU chancellor ( minister of finance) to oversee certain budgetary aspects of Eurozone countries. Try getting a German passport. You have to...