The speech was just a set of vagueish objectives for the next (and we can say barring a real shock event Starmer will be the leader of the next government) government,
It was fine, nothing radical. Just a reminder that the tories are really shit and people deserve better.
Starmer is never going to be radically left wing, the country doesn't want that.
Bless, you think that's an insult :)
If I worked at subway at least I won't have unlike you made up a pretend career in marketing to try an impress a bunch of people who laugh at me on the internet.
:)
Cool, if you want to link to a thread where you have been called batshit by multiple people and other people people (not just me) have implied you are drunk then crack on fella. It does have big Trump stable genius vibes to it though. :)
I'm not going to ruin this thread but can I just point out that linking to a thread where people are asking if you are ok as you are trying to justify Putin and his invasion of Ukraine is maybe not the proof of stability you seem to think it is fella.
It's Batshit to in anyway justify the actions of Putin which is what you are doing.
You are coming out with the same nonsense that Corbyn and the Stop The War came out with a year ago.
Anyway Grenners why are you so shocked political parties promise to do things when in power shock?
It would be weird if not, pledges are not a new thing. If they start carving them into stone then people can be worried.