Search results

Not quite what I said... For the club to maintain wage spend for Championship, rent and outgoings it had to sell 22k tickets a match to break even. No other revenue streams remember... Someone else had them. How many games in 7 seasons do you think we hit that target? Bet it's less than 40...

Is it really that crazy? They didn't want to deal with SISU and wanted new owners. What better way but to install yourself and then either run it or most likely sell on to someone you do like. There's nothing paltry about a rental agreement where the club have to sell 22k tickets a game to...

My second comment was a little tounge in cheek... But now I think about it weren't ACL rumoured to be one of the bidders in the admin process? It's all making sense now.... Obviously not liking the outcome of something makes it automatically illegal in your world.

The registration of the players was of no concern to ACL... All they should have been worried about was where their owed money was. Just a poor excuse to unnecessarily reject the CVA, further proving they couldn't give a fuck about the club. Unless of course they were concerned about the...

I guess that would be another way to do it. EDIT: If that occurred could you see fans creating about ACL holding onto money they rightfully owed other people in the same way they do about SISU? I somehow doubt it.

If it is not related to the golden share deal... (which was in essence for the loss of rent that they had) then why the need for ACL to activate the guarantor aspect? Why would there even be a guarantor deal in place if it was not connected to the rent?

Hypothetical question... if SISU were to offer the £10.8m valuation that came up in the JR in order to buy out ACL. Woud people accept that as a fair offer?

To be fair it does mean that MM and GR should have every right to pursue SISU for that money.

The original guarantor agreement was for 500K - exactly the same value as the ESCROW fund in relation to the rental agreement. Of course it was part of it. It was then negotiated down to 300K. If it wasn't part of the deal then why would 2 guarantors agree to potentially stump up to the tune...

Yes of course. I'm sick to the fucking back teeth of it.

Why should the club be responsible for the earnings of ACL when they gave nothing to the club which directly helped them achieve the revenue in the first place?

Well the 590K itself is a barrier isn't it? There's no way the two parties trust enough to do the transaction directly.. so there must be some 3rd party involved. So why can we not get clarity about this? There are two key points here. The 300K - has it been paid? Have SISU put the money in...

IIRC Simon I believe said that he was told by McGinnity or Robinson that they had paid 300K.... negotiated down from 500K

I did not suggest otherwise... but do we all want a resolution to get them back to Coventry or just have a big SISU OUT chant?

How are we to know. But we get line... the only thing stopping us from returning is Joy Seppala. This is clearly not the case is it?

I do hope you will be applying the same level of pressure on all parties.... after all it takes them all to negotiate to a resolution.

Since the JR result we've been by Anne Lucas that she's prepared to negotiate. But now it seems she's got fuck all authority to do so. Michael then came up with his 'to good to be true deal' with fuck all detail. Turns out that actually him and his associates had no authority to offer deal, and...

This is all becoming pathetic now. This constant positioning in the press is fucking ridiculous, and shows clearly that no-one from either persuasion gives a fuck about the fans. SISU owe ACL that money. Some of which is claimed to have been paid by guarantors. SISU claim to have put the money...

Not sure that all of a sudden the FL will jump just because ACL released a strong statement. SISU 'claim' the money is with the liquidator. If it's true then someone needs to come out and say if this is the case.

It's all OK... remember ACL have got the fans wishes and needs at heart.